Recently, an article about an associate professor at Peking University"Hurdles"The news of entering the school gate caused a lot of discussion. It is reported that the associate professor is often troubled by the access control system in front of the school gate when entering and exiting the campus gate. Due to the long queuing time of the face recognition system at the school gate, he had to spend a lot of time waiting during peak hours, and even sometimes was stopped because he did not have the permission to face recognition, which led to his choice"Hurdles"way into the campus. This scene was witnessed and admonished by the security guards, which eventually led to a scene of riding a bicycle and running away. Later, the associate professor expressed his opinion to the public, saying that the setting of this access control system is an unnecessary constraint for teachers and students, and hopes to return to the more free and convenient way of entering and exiting in the past.
In response to the impact of this incident, the access control system of Peking University has been adjusted. According to a Tsinghua professor's post, Peking University has added a new rule to the existing access control system, that is, only teachers who drive in and out of the campus can be exempted from facial recognition, and teachers and students who enter the campus on foot still need to undergo face verification. This change is seen as a small adjustment to the school's access control policy, and although it is not enough to cause heated discussions, it still helps to solve the dissatisfaction of a small number of teachers and students with the access control system. This adjustment is also considered to be a symbol of freedom and openness to Peking University, and a gap in the opening of the door.
The university campus is a temple of knowledge and a sacred place for academics. There have been long debates about whether college campuses should be closed or not. On the one hand, some people believe that university campuses, as the holy places of higher education, should be opened to the outside world, so that more people have the opportunity to experience the academic atmosphere and improve the educational literacy of the public. Some, on the other hand, believe that the closure of university campuses is necessary to protect the learning environment and personal safety of students.
To a certain extent, closed management helps to maintain the academic atmosphere and order of university campuses. As a place of learning and exploration, university campuses need to provide a quiet, orderly and clean environment for students to concentrate on their studies and research. Too many outsiders entering the campus may interfere with academic activities and affect the learning effectiveness of teachers and students. In addition, the closure also ensures the safety of students. With the development of society, university campuses are also facing various potential security risks, and the entry of outsiders may bring certain dangers to students. Therefore, strictly controlling the entrances and exits of the campus and restricting the entry of outsiders will help maintain the security of the campus.
However, there are also some drawbacks and controversies surrounding the closed management of university campuses. Closed doors limit the flow of information and knowledge, which can lead to a weakening of academic independence. As a source of knowledge, the connection and communication between the university campus and the society cannot be ignored. An open door can introduce more academic resources and cooperation opportunities for the school, and promote academic exchanges and cooperation. In addition, restricting the entry of outsiders may also hinder the supervision and evaluation of schools by society.
Associate professor at this Peking University"Hurdles"In the discussions sparked by the Gate of Entry, we saw a heated debate between the opening and closing of university campuses. While it is necessary to protect the learning environment and personal safety of students, excessive closure can also hinder communication and cooperation between schools and society. Therefore, when formulating an access control policy for a university campus, it is necessary to weigh various pros and cons and adjust it according to the specific situation and development needs of the school.
As my personal reflection and opinion, I believe that the closure and openness of university campuses should be balanced within a reasonable range. Closed doors help create an academic atmosphere and keep students safe, but open doors can bring more academic resources and collaboration opportunities to the school. Therefore, I believe that on the premise of ensuring the safety of students, the university can appropriately relax the access control policy and allow outsiders to visit the school or carry out academic exchange activities, so as to promote the opening and development of the campus.
In short, the opening and closing of university campuses is a complex and multidimensional issue, which needs to take into account the characteristics of the university, the needs of the public, and the changes in society. A reasonable access control policy should both ensure the safety and academic freedom of the school and provide a good learning environment for students. Only by finding a balance between openness and closure can university campuses better play their academic and social roles.