Recently, Tianyancha APP disclosed a high-profile dispute over the right to reputation in the entertainment industry. Plaintiff Di Lieba applied to the court for compulsory enforcement because the defendant Jiang Moumou failed to perform his obligation to apologize. The Beijing Internet Court announced the main verdict of the case, revealing the full picture of the incident.
According to the content of the announcement, Jiang Moumou used his Weibo account to post comments against Di Lieba, with vulgar language and obvious intent to scandalize and belittle the plaintiff. These comments, which are full of invective and personal attacks, have gone beyond the reasonable boundaries of freedom of speech and normal comments, and constitute an infringement of Di Lieba's right to reputation.
In response to this behavior, the Beijing Internet Court made a clear judgment. The court demanded that Jiang Moumou publish an apology statement on his Weibo account and publicly apologize to Di Lieba. At the same time, Jiang Moumou also needs to compensate Di Lieba for economic losses and mental damages totaling 8,150 yuan.
This judgment is not only a safeguard of Di Lieba's personal rights and interests, but also an important judicial practice to balance the protection of freedom of speech and the right to reputation in cyberspace. It reminds the public that when making statements online, they should respect the rights and interests of others and avoid using insulting and offensive language to avoid breaking the law.
For the entertainment industry, this case is also of cautionary significance. Although public figures need to bear a certain amount of public attention and comments, this does not mean that their right to reputation can be arbitrarily violated. Freedom of speech should be premised on not infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of others, and any speech that crosses the line may face legal sanctions.
This incident once again emphasizes the responsibility and boundaries of speech in cyberspace, and also provides a legal reference for similar disputes. It is hoped that through the publicity of such cases and the popularization of legal education, the public's legal awareness of online speech can be enhanced, and a healthy and harmonious online environment can be jointly maintained.