Reading guide:Everyone's situation is different, and whether someone else's experience is good or bad, it's always someone else's. Whether you can succeed in defending your rights or not will only know if you do your best.
Some people who have been demolished have given up after a few days of defending their rights, is it useless for the law?
The ideal is very plump, and the reality is very skinny". I believe that many friends of the demolished people can't help but think of this sentence when they mention the word rights protection.
Many friends of the people who have been demolished have said: "Lawyer, your analysis is particularly correct, this is the case here for us; Your explanation of legal knowledge also sounds very good. However, the reality is not as beautiful as you say, we want to rely on *** but the demolition party does not give a chance. ”
Why do many people who have been demolished think that it is useless to find a lawyer for demolition and relocation rights?This? Why did some of the people who were demolished give up halfway through it?Is it really that the law is useless
Judging from the accounts of these people who were demolished, things are not ...... like this
Case Facts 1:
The demolition party said that they had the final say on the demolition and relocation, and it was useless to find a lawyer
At the beginning, when encountering the demolition, Xiao Wang, the person who was demolished, also tried to persuade Lao Wang, the head of the family, to entrust a lawyer to take legal means to defend his rights. Lao Wang was also a little moved at first, but after chatting with the staff of the demolition party, he firmly rejected Xiao Wang's proposal.
Lao Wang said that the demolition personnel said that the demolition and relocation matter is in their hands, under the control of the policy, not by the lawyer. Even if the lawyer intervenes in the case, it is only a formality, and it is impossible to offend the demolition party for the purpose of the person being demolished, and the person being demolished is just spending money in vain.
As a result, Xiao Wang did a lot of homework, spent a lot of time contacting a lawyer for consultation, and learned the legal knowledge of demolition, but in the end, it didn't come in handy. Although he was not satisfied with the compensation conditions, Lao Wang, who was afraid of causing trouble, still listened to the requirements of the demolition party, signed the compensation agreement, and asked Xiao Wang to go to work hard and stop all those bells and whistles.
You may wish to think about a few questions:If the demolition is really what the demolition party said, then put the state and the law in the first place? If what the demolition party said is Chrysostom, then why are so many people who have been demolished confirm whether the demolition party has violated the law through legal channels, and successfully overturn the unreasonable compensation conditions given by the demolition party?
It costs money to hire a lawyer, and you can't promise what the outcome will be, who knows if it's reliable
Pursuing advantages and avoiding disadvantages is an important lesson in the process of biological evolution. When we come into contact with new things that we don't often encounter in our daily life, we always need "the first person to eat crabs" to help us navigate the depth of the road ahead.
It is true that the results may not be immediate, and some difficult cases may even take a year or two or even longer to see results. At this time, the people who are being demolished will be very worried: With such a long time span, is this way of protecting rights really reliable?
Case Facts 2:
Ms. Liu, the person who was demolished, said that before entrusting a lawyer to intervene in the case, she waited and watched for a long time and consulted many lawyers. The lawyer she consulted refused to promise her the possibility of "winning" and failure, which was the main reason why she had been unable to make up her mind.
What the demolition lawyer wants to say isEveryone's situation is different, and whether someone else's experience is good or bad, it's always someone else's. Whether you can succeed in defending your rights or not will only know if you do your best.
For the people who have been demolished, the most important thing is to understand the professional ability and professional ethics of a lawyer through various aspects. If the lawyer has rich experience and solid professional knowledge, he can lead the people who have been demolished to strive for the best outcome in various circumstances. Reality should have taught us a long time ago: more important than illusory promises is strength and hard work.
Case Facts 3:
I wanted to defend my rights, but my neighbors decided to sign it, and I didn't want to be itRising birds
Mr. Su, who was demolished, felt that the compensation was too low and did not want to accept it, so he discussed with his neighbors to entrust a lawyer, but when Mr. Su was still actively organizing everyone to contact and communicate with the lawyer, suddenly the neighbors withdrew from the "group chat" and told Mr. Su that they had decided to sign and would not take the legal route. In turn, he persuaded Mr. Su to "don't waste your efforts and affect everyone to get compensation".
From everyone uniting to defend their rights together, to only Mr. Su and three or two neighbors left, the sudden change made Mr. Su a little confused: why didn't everyone suddenly feel that the compensation was low? The compensation is indeed a little unreasonable!
If the compensation is fair and reasonable, and the person being demolished just wants to raise the price more, then it is normal to give up this idea at any timeBut the compensation is really too low, why would anyone defend their rights halfway and turn around?
It is conceivable that if it is useless, this kind of change that tries to shake the determination of the demolished people to defend their rights will not happen. If the person being demolished gives up at this time, he is undoubtedly making way for the interests of others.
There is a "common saying" in the college entrance examination volunteer class, which says: "Persuading people to study medicine, the sky is thundering; Persuading people to study the Fa is a thousand cuts. It doesn't sound very elegant and a little funny, but only real medical and law students know how much responsibility and bitterness is behind this sentence.
If you want to become a qualified lawyer, you must not only be prepared to spend a lot of time and energy studying hard all your life, but also endure the hard work of running around in the scorching heat and cold. Behind the domineering scenery of the courtroom, the lawyer's hard work and sweat are no less than anyone else's.
And all this is to prove what Plato said: law is the crystallization of all human wisdom, including all social thought and morality.
The law is still imperfect, but it is constantly improving, and it is the most reliable tool for rights protection and correction that we can think of and have access to. If the law really doesn't work, how can there be so many saints and sages who speak for itIf the law is really useless, how can there be so many successful demolition and relocation cases.