It is indeed not an easy task to serve in the army until retirement. Because, when the soldiers in the iron-clad battalion are unable to be promoted after a certain number of years, they will be demobilized or transferred.
Both friends in the military circles were fortunate enough to work in the military until they retired and entered the pension group.
A colonel with the rank of colonel, with no hope of promotion to general, retired. Four years ago, in the first month of receiving his pension, he told me that everything added up to 24,850 yuan. Subsequently, there is a certain percentage of growth every year. At present, it is not far from 30,000.
Another friend, a colonel, is retired. According to the current practice, a colonel cannot retire from the army. But this friend was born before the military reform, and he couldn't be born at the age of 50, so he chose to retire and was directly taken over by the army's cadre retreat. At first, the pension was not very high, only more than 5,000 yuan, but then it grew all the way, and now it is close to 20,000 yuan. Because after he retired, the army's salaries increased, and the number of retirees also increased.
At all levels of the ** department, some friends informed. A deputy minister-level ** retires, with 43 years of service, and a pension of more than 16,000 yuan. There is little difference between the deputy ministerial and ministerial levels in terms of pensions, but the treatment of non-pensions is very different. For example, after the minister's retirement, there was no self-financed medicine for medical treatment, and there was a special car, and the secretary has always had it. Regular funds will be allocated for the inspection expenses of him, his family and his entourage. These deputy ministers do not. A director-level ** retire can receive about 15,000 yuan, and the director is more than 11,000 yuan.
* There will be some differences in the pension with different regions, sometimes it will be much worse, that is because the economic development status of different places is different, and the subsidies provided to retirement** are different.
Police officers as a group have a lower overall level of pensions than the military, but higher than their peers*** The reason given is that their work is risky.
Another group of high pensions is state-owned enterprises. They usually pay full social security for managers. Therefore, the pension you get after retirement is naturally generous.
Some ordinary enterprises provide the lowest pension insurance for employees, which is equivalent to only one compulsory traffic insurance for cars. Therefore, the pensions received by the employees of these enterprises are generally not high.
Take the Xinjiang Corps, for example, which is a state-owned enterprise. Now retired employees, the working experience is about 40 years, and many of the pensions they get are less than 4,000 yuan.
As for the urban workers who choose their jobs freely, they pay their own insurance and basically choose the minimum standard. For example, in Beijing, if you choose your job freely, the Social Security Bureau does not allow people who do not have a Beijing household registration to pay their own insurance, but must do so through an intermediary. The agent pretends to hire you, and you provide the part paid by the agent and the part paid by the company, and then give the agent a service fee, which pays social security for you. For this part of the population, the pension is the lowest. According to the specific situation of each region, the high can take more than 2,000, and the less can be more than 1,000.
When it comes to pensions versus contributions while on the job, there is a big divide. Those with vested interests naturally think that their great contribution is the result of their lifelong struggle. Opposing voices believe that everyone has more than 20 years of time to receive a pension after retirement, and everyone is stirring up a spoon in the social security pool, why should you get dozens of times more income than others.
The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable. In fact, it should be understood here that a pension is not equal to a salary. Although they are both real gold**, the functions of the two are completely different. The main function of the pension is to maintain the stability of the society, while the salary is to provide material incentives for those who work. Therefore, pensions should be inclined towards social fairness, and wages should be inclined to improve efficiency.
Speaking of pensions and personal struggles. I think there is a certain relationship, but it is more about the influence of the external environment. Two comrades-in-arms were demobilized at the same time, one was assigned to the police department and the other was assigned to an enterprise, and the difference in pensions was doubled. Is this the result of personal struggle?