The matter of "Xue Zhiqian's theft" is getting bigger and bigger, and more and more people are involved in this most vocal competition in the Spring Festival, and even the popularity of Chunshan Studies seems to have dissipated.
Many people are arguing about whether it is illegal to steal and shoot, compared with the arrogance of fans who raise their heads and shout "You call the police", the popular science in the industry is much more plain.
The truth always becomes clearer the more it is argued. Xue Zhiqian's theft of this incident, I think everyone is scolding not only Xue ZhiqianThere are countless moments when I was plagued by uncivilized behavior in the movie theater, but I didn't make a noise.
Can you screen shoot with good intentions?
The origin of everything is that the day before yesterday, Xue Zhiqian posted a small essay on his Weibo about the post-screening perception of "Flying Life 2", which put three screen shots of the movie content.
Although Xue Zhiqian's words were to promote the filmmaker, this kind of behavior of public figures posting screen photos on public platforms quickly aroused the condemnation of fans.
At this point, if Xue Zhiqian responded quickly + took the opportunity to popularize science, he could have turned a trivial matter into nothing. But his response was a yin and yang weird limerick poem, saying that "the deity is grateful", and also said that he "has a bright heart".
Such a hard top response quickly further intensified the matter, and Xue Zhiqian's fans also posted their own movies in the comment area to support him and quarrel with netizens.
CCTV News even pulled out a professor from the University of Political Science and Law to interpret the legal significance and basis of the theft.
Xue Zhiqian also took this article, taking this as legal evidence for his "reason", and continued to be angry with everyone.
This is not the first time that a public figure has posted a ** on his own screen, but it is the most vigorous one at present.
Sun Yang, who has been posting on Weibo every year and calling on everyone not to take pictures, has also been affected, and was scolded for "not being popular but loving rubbing", and some people think that he is pouring oil for Xue Zhiqian.
But what really came out to pour oil was actually Bi Zhifei, who made "Dream Showbiz", who posted on Weibo that if he made a movie about piracy and invited Xue Zhiqian to star, he would definitely be able to mention a more shocking score than the previous one.
Seeing that ** is getting more and more lively, there is a lot of noise around whether Xue Zhiqian is wrong or not.
It is estimated that Xue Zhiqian himself was also wronged, and he kindly helped the filmmaker write a small composition to promote it, why did he get to this point?
If you don't break the law, there's nothing wrong
In fact, the whole thing is only sesame, but the "Six Princesses" movie channel participated in the discussion, and CCTV News asked experts to explain the issue of copyright infringement, and the atmosphere suddenly became serious and ......
Part of the reason why there is such a big reason is indeed because there is a gray space in the legal basis of screen photography, where is its boundary, and whether publishing movie pictures on social ** constitutes infringement, there is indeed a scope for discussion in the legal profession.
But there is no doubt that it is indeed a violation to point the lens of a mobile phone at a movie screen - if you look closely at the movie ticket stub, you will find that it says not to take photos or videos.
It has been the industry and fans who have resisted uncivilized movie-watching behavior for several years.
Compared with the ambiguity of the law, the film industry and the ** have developed a norm that is ahead of the law:"After the dragon mark appears, there can be no shooting."and publicize it.
Today, CCTV News posted "There is no such thing as theft in the law", and three years ago also posted "Screen photography is theft", calling on everyone to put away their mobile phones after the dragon mark is lit up.
This kind of repetition also shows the ambiguity and practicality of this matter.
The problem now is that "screen photography" is indeed not a mandatory norm of the law, at least in terms of implementation, there is a lot of room for flexibility.
Most of the time, everyone takes a picture of themselves, and then there will be no punishment for taking a movie picture and sending it to Moments, and the judicial system cannot afford to run at full speed to punish each ** picture in order to maintain the sanctity of copyright.
Many ordinary viewers who watch the movie do not know the error of the "screen shot", and the staff of the theater rarely walk in to stop the audience taking pictures during the movie screening.
Especially this time, Xue Zhiqian also said when he excused himself, and the creator thanked him.
It is the norm for film marketing to mobilize resources and let public figures promote their own **, but in the future where interactive marketing continues to be popular, it also shows a problem:The traffic brought by the screen and the second creation vs strict copyright protection standards.
So the overall situation of this matter is that the legal boundaries have not been clarified, and the society has not fully formed a consensus, but the industry has promoted a standard of common sense.
That inevitably leads to a result:What if someone just shoots?
If the photographer is an ordinary audience, as long as the whole shooting is not widely circulated, there is a high probability that there will be no chase. But Xue Zhiqian, as a public figure, a member of the industry, and as a **person who will also face copyright troubles, he is so aggressive to post his own screen movie on Weibo**. Refusing to apologize after being pointed out by netizens and using the gray area of the law to excuse themselves is undoubtedly a regression that pulls the bottom line of the entire industry. A year ago, when the Spring Festival movies collectively boycotted screen shooting, they definitely didn't expect that a year later, everyone would be arguing over whether celebrities can screen shoot.
That's where I'm most angry and helpless in the whole thing.
Teacher Luo Xiang said that the law is only the minimum moral requirement for people. If everyone lives only beyond the minimum of the law, then many of the orders that maintain the appearance of our civilized society will only collapse in an instant.
It's like pooping on the street may not be illegal, but if you do do it on the pedestrian street, everyone passing by will spit on the stars and make you die.
Therefore, Xue Zhiqian's matter, if he only uses laws and regulations as a golden bell jar, is it not a kind of neglect of civilization and morality?
The logo of the cinema is invisible, the tips of the movie ticket are ignored, and the promotion and publicity in the industry year after year cannot be listened to, so why did everyone's accusations suddenly hear it and become angry?
The behavior of taking pictures of ordinary viewers and posting them to Moments is even more speechless when it is confused with Xue Zhiqian's Weibo.
Can ordinary people have such influence as an artist? Ordinary people can send a Weibo to drive hundreds of people to post a screen in the comment area**?
Not breaking the law does not mean that it is right, back to the core topic, Xue Zhiqian's screen photography is also publicly issued, which is uncivilized and immoral.
After watching for two days, in the pessimistic entry of "The First Year of Piracy", I, as one of the industry practitioners, actually have a lot to say.
During the Spring Festival every year, it is actually when I am reluctant to go to the cinema, because there will be screaming bear children here, middle-aged uncles with the brightest brightness on their mobile phones, and discussion couples who discuss so loudly that they seem to be talking about a talk show.
These are all uncivilized movie-watching behaviors, I once tried to persuade them, but later found that unless I became a movie theater judge, I would never be able to control it, and I was helpless.
Every year, there are new reports of breaking through the number of moviegoers during the Spring Festival, and watching movies during this Spring Festival has almost become a ritual for ordinary peopleThe popularization of science on how to watch a civilized movie is actually as worthy of attention as the quality of the movie.
Again, this discussion is indeed neededWhether there is a specific standard for screen photography and theft requires a red line that can be landed. If the recording is illegal, when exactly does the law intervene, there must be a point, is it based on the time of recording? According to the amount of transmission? According to any other annotation?
I also very much hope that these discussions and controversies will make the matter of "screen photography" clearer and more widely disseminated, and also make the appearance of similar uncivilized behaviors a little less.