In 2024, under the wave of institutional reform, administrative law enforcement personnel will be delegated to townships and townships, and the secretaries of the township party committees will smile brightly.
For the reform of administrative law enforcement, it is not easy to stride into, to move forward steadily, the specific ways and means of reform, but also need to be cautious, let us take a look at the difficulties and opportunities of administrative law enforcement reform.
All law enforcement civil servants are delegated to neighborhoods, communities, and townships. The staffing, personnel, and salaries are all transferred to the township level, and the township is fully responsible.
This has an advantage: that is, the township can have the greatest autonomy, and can carry out a series of problems such as land disputes and environmental remediation in a bold way, and no longer ask the county-level units for personnel to cooperate with law enforcement, so that the target work of the township can be completed to a greater extent.
Of course, the drawbacks are also obvious: when townships and towns manage on their own, supervision over law enforcement personnel is easy to be loose, and when townships and towns have personnel management powers, it is not known whether law enforcement personnel will follow the relevant laws and regulations and devote themselves to the public interest, and this leads to problems in the quality and professional level of law enforcement personnel, and it is easier to cause contradictions between law enforcement personnel and the masses, making the masses miserable.
All law enforcement civil servants are delegated to neighborhoods, communities, and townships. However, the personnel and establishment of personnel remain in the bureau organs, and the salaries are the responsibility of the townships and towns.
The advantages are: townships and bureaus can have jurisdiction over their law enforcement personnel, law enforcement personnel can cooperate with townships to carry out their relevant work tasks, and personnel will have a sense of tension, townships and towns no longer have to worry about the quality of law enforcement personnel and professional level ability, if the work is not done well, you can still send back to the original unit to rebuild again, assigned to other places.
The disadvantages are: the first point is that the welfare of law enforcement personnel cannot be guaranteed, when the work of the township and the work of the bureau conflict, the law enforcement personnel do not have the appropriate right to dispose of it, because there are two leaders to manage, the law enforcement personnel will not have a sense of belonging, and even when the two units kick the ball with each other, it is a kind of harm to the law enforcement personnel.
All law enforcement civil servants are delegated to neighborhoods, communities, and townships. However, the personnel, establishment, and salary of personnel are all managed by the bureau organs, and the townships and towns only have the right to borrow people.
The advantages are: administrative law enforcement personnel have the backing of the bureau organs, to ensure the welfare of law enforcement personnel, to do the work can be targeted at the front line, there is no township constraints, you can let go of your hands and feet, dedicated to the public, you can have nothing to do with the township and the heart of the heart, law enforcement personnel work performance will inevitably go to a higher level.
The disadvantage is that because the township does not have the real power to manage the law enforcement personnel, it will lead to the fact that in some work, the law enforcement personnel have their own ideas and cannot properly cooperate with the work of the township and township.
Before the reform, the staffing, personnel, and wages all belonged to the bureau, and the people recruited after the reform all went to the townships and towns, and the old people led the new people to enforce the law, study together, and enforce the law together.
The advantages are: the old people have experience, the newcomers have energy, cooperate with each other, the work can be implemented, for the work, the old people have the right to suggest, for management, the township has a set of its own team, the old and the new alternate, a certain degree of blood transfusion changes.
The disadvantage is that when people compare with each other and receive different treatments, their motivation to work is easily affected. Township management can only manage half of it.
No matter what kind of policy, there are good sides and bad sides, this is the original intention of the reform, take its essence to its dross, is a kind of promotion of reform, I don't know how the reform in your hometown is, you can leave the benefits of reform in the comment area, let everyone learn.