With the rapid development of technology, the competition in the smartphone industry is becoming increasingly fierce. In order to gain a foothold in the market, major brands are launching innovative features and technologies. However, this competition can also sometimes lead to some controversies and disputes. Recently, Honor released MagicOS 8The new function "Arbitrary Door" in the 0 operating system has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions, and the reason is that it is similar to the One Step function of Hammer Technology, which is accused of ***
Honor MagicOS 80 is an important update for Honor phones, bringing many new features and optimizations. Among them, the "Any Door" function, with its unique AI understanding ability, allows users to find the applications and functions they need more quickly when using mobile phones, improving the efficiency of use. However, soon after the release of this feature, it attracted doubts from Luo Yonghao, the founder of Hammer Technology.
Luo Yonghao publicly expressed his opinion on social **, and bluntly pointed out the glory magicos 8The "Arbitrary Door" feature in 0 plagiarized the one step of the Hammer phone. He also said with a little irony that Glory may have been blinded by its own designers, and such obvious plagiarism was not seen. Luo Yonghao's remarks immediately attracted the attention and discussion of netizens, pushing this incident to the forefront.
It is worth mentioning that Luo Yonghao and Apple's "grievances" have a long history. He has said on several occasions that he wants to "buy Apple", which once became a hot topic on the Internet. Therefore, while questioning the glory this time, Luo Yonghao did not forget to "scold" Apple by the way. He believes that Honor's plagiarism of the hammer is the same as Apple's, which is a blatant plagiarism of other people's ideas.
With Luo Yonghao's voice, the matter quickly fermented on the Internet. Related topics such as "Lao Luo's accusation" and "Glory's response" have appeared on the hot search list and become the focus of heated discussions among netizens. In response to this incident, the glory side also responded. They did not choose to respond to Luo Yonghao's doubts head-on, but responded to the attention of the outside world through third-party interviews.
Honor said that the underlying logic of "Arbitrary Gate" is not the same as that of Hammer One Step. One Step is just a simplification of the path on function transfer, while "Arbitrary Gate" has AI recognition capabilities, which can quickly identify user intent and match the corresponding APP functions. The implication is that "arbitrary doors" should be more technologically advanced and practical. Honor also emphasized that they have always been committed to innovation and technology research and development, and will not copy the results of other companies.
However, netizens have different opinions on Glory's response. Some people think that Luo Yonghao's accusation is too harsh, after all, in the smartphone industry, similar functions are not uncommon. Just because two have similar features doesn't make it easy to label the latter as plagiarism. At the same time, some netizens expressed their support for Luo Yonghao's view, believing that Honor did borrow the ideas of the hammer in this update, but did not innovate and improve enough.
In fact, in the process of the development of the smartphone industry, it has become a norm to learn from each other. Major brands continue to learn from each other's strengths and experiences in the competition in order to achieve better performance in the market. However, there should also be a degree of this borrowing and learning. Relying too much on the ideas and technologies of others and neglecting your own R&D and innovation will only lead to the stagnation of the entire industry.
For Honor, this controversy has undoubtedly had a certain impact on its brand image. However, it is also a reminder and cautionary tale in the long run. Remind Honor to pay more attention to innovation and technology research and development in the future development to avoid falling into the quagmire of plagiarism and imitation. At the same time, it also warns other brands to respect the intellectual property rights and labor achievements of others, and not to blindly follow the trend or maliciously plagiarize.
In short, Honor MagicOS 8The controversy caused by the new function "Arbitrary Door" is not only a simple plagiarism problem, but also a deep reflection on the innovation ability and intellectual property protection of the entire smartphone industry. It is hoped that in the future, major brands can uphold the principles of innovation and respect for intellectual property rights, and jointly promote the prosperity and progress of the smartphone industry.