According to RIA Novosti, Zelensky canceled *** In response, Zelensky said: No, I didn't, no one canceled any elections. Rather, the law says that in a state of war, there can be no elections in Ukraine. According to Ukrainian law, ** is held every five years, and if it is a state of war, it can be dispensed without***
Zelensky was successful in his election in 2019 and became a Ukrainian **, which is about to reach its fifth year, and a new round of *** should have kicked off. But Zelensky extended Ukraine's wartime status for a full 90 days in early February. This means that before May, Ukraine will definitely not do *** this thing. At the same time, Zelensky also stressed that my current support rating in Ukraine is very high, and if it is carried out, there is no doubt that the people will definitely vote for me. But you can't do *** now
Is the situation really as Zelensky said? If he was sure of being elected, why didn't he do it on time *** but deliberately prolonged the wartime state, could it be that after these 90 days, Ukraine will no longer be in a wartime state? Obviously, no. Zelensky is doing this on purpose, deliberately avoiding the *** thing, buying time for himself, and wanting to make some achievements in a hurry. There are two reasons for this:
1.According to the latest polls, Zelensky's approval rating has fallen from 77% at the end of last year to 64% now. Opposition to him rose from 22 percent to 35 percent. And his political opponent, Zaluzhny, the former commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army who was removed by Zelensky, has a 94% approval rating in Ukraine.
2.Zelensky was scared. There is a lot of criticism in Ukraine, saying that he is the most corrupt in Ukraine's history. Similarly, the West is not too happy with his frequent defeats on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield. If Zelensky loses his campaign, the consequences for him are severe.
At the Munich Security Conference a few days ago, Zelensky also didn't care about his face, and publicly admitted that the Ukrainian army was in a difficult situation in many places on the front line, and the direct reason was the serious delay in military assistance from the United States and the West, hoping that the West would continue to support Ukraine. In the end, Zelensky did get financial aid. First, Germany pledged to provide Ukraine with military financial assistance totaling more than 7 billion euros; Secondly, France will provide Ukraine with 3 billion euros in aid. Coupled with the fact that the US Senate previously passed $60 billion in military aid to Ukraine, Ukraine can fight a rich war this time. I have to say that Zelensky still has a set of money.
In addition to military assistance, on Ukraine's accession to NATO, Ukrainian parliamentarian Alexei Goncharenko asked Blinken: What other options does Kyiv have against Moscow? Unless Ukraine receives full NATO membership, if NATO does not accept us, then"It is necessary to build a nuclear bomb", we don't need 1000, we need 20 to suffice. However, Blinken did not respond to this in person, and it is estimated that people were stupid at the time.
In the aftermath of the Ukraine crisis, China has made it clear to the world that a nuclear war cannot be fought, and nuclear weapons cannot be used, and we oppose this. China's consistent position is that we will unconditionally not use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear country, nor will we be the first to use nuclear weapons, and the whole world should work together to safeguard the safety of nuclear facilities.
Judging from the present, China's statement at that time was very predictable. Assuming that the United States and the West no longer provide military assistance to Ukraine, Ukraine is likely to sacrifice a nuclear bomb, and the world will face a nuclear catastrophe at that time.