Some time ago, Taiwan's coast guard ship rammed and sank a mainland fishing boat, resulting in the death of two mainland fishermen, and this news shocked both sides of the strait. In the face of pressure and doubts, the Taiwan authorities have continuously changed their rhetoric in an attempt to cover up the facts.
Initially, they claimed that the mainland fishing boat was a "three-nil" vessel and should be seized. The two mainland fishermen fell into the water and died because the mainland fishing boat "snaked and refused to be inspected and accidentally capsized".
Obviously, this argument cannot be sustained, because those who know the inside will see the loophole in it: if we really want to refuse inspection, then our fishermen can sail at full speed to the mainland, so why do they want to snake like you say? Isn't that asking for trouble?
Subsequently, Taiwan's "Coast Guard" claimed that there were video recordings as evidence, but these videos were "investigative materials that can only be viewed by judicial departments" and could not be made public. This practice sparked a backlash from us, who demanded that they "make the video public".
In the face of pressure, the Taiwan side changed its story on February 22 and said that the coast guard ship "did not have fixed surveillance and video equipment", and the situation was urgent at that time, and it could not be recorded, so there was no on-site video.
Overall, this kind of capricious and inconsistent performance is ridiculous, and netizens on the island can't stand it. No matter what the attitude towards the mainland is, whose people can tolerate their own ** being so incompetent and losing their own face?
Just when the Taiwan authorities were embarrassed, Kuomintang politician Chen Yuzhen stood up and said that he was completely victimized by the policies they had promulgated in the past.
In the past, the Taiwan authorities had law enforcement recorders and various cameras, and when they encountered disputes, they could be taken out and checked. However, after the outbreak of the Sino-US war, the United States frequently called for a boycott of any cameras made in China on the grounds that "Chinese products will leak information".
This statement is ridiculous, many cameras are not connected to the Internet at all, and devices that are not connected to the Internet, unless you take the initiative to hand over **, how can information be leaked?
But *** ignore these, the United States will say a word, and they will abide by it. Immediately after they came to power, they issued an order banning the use of any Chinese-made cameras.
As a result of this regulation, small cameras in the fields of global security and law enforcement are all made in China, and it is almost impossible to find other brands. **The regulations are actually tantamount to telling Taiwan's "Coast Guard" that they can only use mobile phones to take pictures**.
However, who can take a clear picture with their mobile phone while driving a speedboat? This led to the aforementioned situation.
To sum up, the Taiwan authorities can only choose one of two options now: either they originally had the video, but now it is gone, and they have to explain to everyone the whereabouts of **; Either they have to admit that the policies of the past were so stupid that we can't even solve the problem through judicial means.
Whatever choice they make, the only right thing to do is to apologize to us and punish the perpetrators.