Every time the reform of colleges and universities only takes teachers, netizens have a lot of discussions!
The reform of the middle school did not involve administrators but teachers, which sparked debate among netizens.
In recent years, there have been major reforms in various universities, the most notable of which is implementation"Either up or down"The system requires that those who fail to complete the research task on time or fail to meet the specified time will be ordered to withdraw from the university, which is equivalent to dropping out.
Some people feel that this reform is positive and can greatly stimulate the enthusiasm of teachers, but many people oppose it. Recently, some netizens on the Internet have asked why the direction of university education reform is always directed at teachers, rather than administrators. Let's take a look:
We need to support the reform of the university, but we must start with the management team, especially in management, and don't always push the teachers too hard. Chinese universities are currently facing many problems, and one of the main reasons is that the management level is too high. There are more than 200 cadres at the department level in a university and at the department level, including those at and above the section level. In many universities, the number of administrators has outnumbered the number of faculty.
Moreover, this large group of people also controls the fate of teachers, determines the allocation of resources to the school, and even determines the fate of the school. In this context, it is extremely difficult to produce research results at an international level, which is fundamentally contrary to the laws of education.
I have to admit that this netizen is right. This post has attracted a lot of people's attention.
First, we need to ask: Who are the main forces of the university? Undoubtedly, most people think of teachers on the front line.
The front-line teaching staff of colleges and universities is the main force in the construction of talent team, and their level will be directly related to the quality of talent training. Because without them, there can be no education, and without education, there can be no schooling. The primary task of the administrative logistics work of colleges and universities is to serve the teaching and enable teachers to better devote themselves to their work.
However, in today's colleges and universities, teachers have a heavy workload and are faced with a variety of exams, and the work of the administration is relatively leisurely. This is very illogical. What's more, this large group of people still controls the life and death of many teachers, including the establishment of various assessment systems and the allocation of various resources, which make front-line teachers very unhappy.
Second, instead of a quantitative evaluation of university administrators, a variety of evaluations are conducted on teachers.
In recent years, the university has undergone continuous changes, but no matter how they change, it seems that it is only the teachers who will be affected, and the negative impact on the administrators will be minimal.
At present, the assessment of college teachers is mainly focused on teaching performance, scientific research achievements, publications, etc., while the assessment of college teachers is basically none. Teachers are in danger of failing exams every year, but have you ever heard of those who fail their exams? How can we explain that the hard-working and hard-working front-line teachers were dismissed because they failed the final assessment?
The management cadres of many universities have a very high status in society, and sometimes their salaries even exceed those of some professors. For front-line teachers, this kind of treatment is difficult for them to accept.
In fact, not only colleges and universities, but also primary and secondary schools have the same problem. All the education reforms seem to be aimed at the front-line teachers.
The study found that school administrators, who were originally working for the teacher community, have gradually expanded their powers in recent years to become a team of teachers. The management cadres of primary and secondary schools are not particularly prominent, but the management cadres in universities, who are in high positions, are really uncomfortable with the professors.
The problem that the netizen said does exist, and I hope that the school can pay enough attention to it and put forward corresponding governance requirements. What are your thoughts on this matter? Share it!
The author of this article has no intentions, nor does it have any intentions regarding any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The information provided in this ** does not mean that it agrees or agrees with any laws, rules, opinions, actions, or is responsible for the correctness of the information contained therein. The author of the article is not responsible for the above or related issues, and does not assume any legal responsibility.