When the policy is aimed at reducing the burden on the grassroots, it is surprising that the grassroots in some areas are experiencing it"The more you reduce, the more you lose".phenomenon. One of the core reasons is the reality of self-pressure for personal promotion. Behind this phenomenon is a reflection of a deeper officialdom culture and mentality.
In officialdom, opportunities for promotion are limited and there are many competitors. This kind"There are more monks and less porridge".The situation made them have to start a fierce competition. They demonstrate their abilities and achievements through various innovations and reform attempts, hoping to attract the attention of their superiors.
For example, the data fraud incident in Guangming County reflected in the "County Party Committee Compound" is a direct manifestation of this mentality. **In the process of pursuing promotion,often do not hesitate to sacrifice the effectiveness of work, just to show more brilliant results on the surface。This way of working, in which form is better than substance, exacerbates the workload and reveals the utilitarian overtones of officialdom culture.
In such an environment, the pressure on the grassroots is increasing. They have to complete their daily work tasks, and they are constantly looking for new working methods and innovations in order to gain an advantage in the fierce competition for promotion. However, this practice often makes the work more onerous, leading to the phenomenon of "less and more burden".
Another important reason is the fierce competition for limited resources at the grassroots level. In the context of resource allocation, grassroots units have to invest tremendous energy and resources to ensure that they are in a favorable position in the competition.
Taking "The Courtyard of the County Party Committee" as an example, the contrast between Guangming County and Jiuyuan County depicted in the play vividly shows the inequality between poor and rich areas in the competition for resources. Faced with the unequal distribution of resources, grassroots units have had to adopt various strategies and efforts, including proposing more innovative projects and plans, in order to obtain more support and funding, in order to be prioritized in the evaluation of superiors.
This scramble for resources is not simply an administrative task, but a battle of strategy and wisdom. In this process, the grassroots ** must not only show their strength and potential, but also ensure that they can get enough support in limited resources. This competitive environment forces grassroots and grassroots governments to increase their workload and efforts, which in turn leads to an increase in workload.
"Demonstration point" and "advanced point".The scramble reflects this phenomenon even more. Being part of these projects brings financial and resource support, as well as enhancing the reputation and influence of the region. In order to meet these standards, a lot of additional work must be done at the grassroots level, including detailed planning, reporting and project implementation, which undoubtedly adds to the workload of the grassroots level.
Another important aspect of the problem of reducing the burden at the grassroots level is the evasion of responsibility. In the current political environment, with the increasing strengthening of accountability mechanisms, grassroots ** often choose to adopt a more conservative and passive way of working in order to avoid potential responsibilities and risks. They have the pressure to complete daily tasks and, more importantly, how to avoid possible responsibilities and mistakes in the process of performing tasks. This pressure has led to an overly cautious attitude, with grassroots ** preferring to take conservative measures at work to avoid any liability issues that may arise.
For example, during the inspection and assessment of the superiors, the grass-roots units often need to carry out a lot of preparatory work, such as staying up late to catch up with the system, improving the files, etc., which consumes a lot of time and energy, but often does not help much to improve the actual work effect. This kind of "trace" management method increases the workload to a certain extent, but does not really improve the quality or efficiency of the work.
In addition, an over-emphasis on account-avoidance of work can lead to a lack of commitment to the work that really matters at the grassroots level, neglecting more effective and innovative ways of working. The grassroots ** focuses more on avoiding mistakes than pursuing excellence in their work, and this mentality inhibits the innovation and development of grassroots work to a certain extent.
To solve the problem of reducing the burden on the grassroots, it is necessary to improve the working environment and reduce unnecessary burdens, and it is also necessary to adjust and optimize the accountability mechanism, and encourage the grassroots to adopt more active and innovative working methods, so as to truly improve work efficiency and quality.
I hope the above content will be helpful to you, please bear with me and correct the wrong place. Thank you for reading and supporting! Friends who like this article, please light it upLike + Follow