The announcement of King Charles III's illness caused a global uproar. However, Buckingham Palace did not disclose details of the king's diagnosis. Royal expert Mark Roche explains why the royal family is afraid to reveal the nature of King Charles III's cancer.
Since the announcement of Buckingham Palace, Britain has been worried. In a statement, Buckingham Palace said: "Another concern has been identified during the King's recent surgery for an enlarged prostate. Through further diagnostic tests, a form of cancer was identified. "Despite the problems that have persisted since the declaration of the king's illness, those around him have stressed that despite being diagnosed with cancer, the king does not intend to ask his state adviser to replace him and that he continues to deal with constitutional matters.
Although the king made his diagnosis public, he was reluctant to reveal the nature of his cancer.
In the acceptance of galaIn an interview with FR, Mark Roche, a London-based expert on the Windsor royal family, explained why the royal family was reluctant to reveal details of Charles III's illness. "There has always been such a problem in the court. They started preaching transparency and then they took it back. They were afraid to reveal the nature of Charles III's cancer because they did not want to discuss the question of the king's longevity. In order not to cause public panic, they are more inclined to mention respect for privacy," he said.
Then he added: "But by half-stopping, this new transparency strategy raises more questions than answers." If Prince William had health problems, the situation would have been completely different. But Charles III was still heavily influenced by his mother's culture of revealing as little information as possible when it came to health. "It's a tightly guarded secret, and it should still be there.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program