The situation in the South China Sea has recently attracted renewed attention. Marcos Marcos of the Philippines has recently taken a series of actions to strengthen cooperation with Vietnam's coast guard, which is seen by the outside world as a clear provocation against China. Although the Philippine side claims that this cooperation is not aimed at China, it has in fact violated the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea and has had a negative impact on regional peace and stability. Recently, the Philippines and Vietnam signed an agreement on the establishment of a communication** and the establishment of a Joint Coast Guard Commission aimed at enhancing the partnership and operational capabilities of the two coast guards. However, this cooperation is clearly directional and could further escalate tensions in the South China Sea. The Philippine side's actions are undoubtedly worrying, because it not only violates international law, but also triggers an escalation of regional conflicts. It is worth noting that the China Coast Guard recently dispatched 25 ships to the waters near Mischief Reef, demonstrating China's determination to defend its territorial sea sovereignty. This action shows that China will not sit idly by, but will take the necessary measures to preserve its territorial integrity.
However, the Philippine side is not worried about this, does this mean that the Philippine side is ready to respond? The South China Sea has always been a sensitive hotspot issue. China has vast territorial and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea, while countries such as the Philippines claim portions of the sea. This has led to long-standing disputes and tensions. In order to maintain peace and stability in the region, all parties need to resolve disputes through dialogue and negotiation, rather than taking provocative actions. Although the Philippines claims that its cooperation with Vietnam is not directed at China, this claim is not widely shared. The Philippine actions are clearly using Vietnam as its ally in the South China Sea in an attempt to put pressure on China. Such behaviour is not only detrimental to regional peace and stability, but may also lead to further tensions. The South China Sea issue requires all parties to remain calm and exercise restraint and refrain from all actions that could lead to an escalation of the conflict. It is only through dialogue and cooperation that a way forward can be found to resolve disputes.
The international community should also play an active role in promoting dialogue and negotiation among all parties in the region and contributing to peace and stability in the South China Sea. All in all, the Philippines' move to strengthen cooperation with Vietnam in the Coast Guard has undoubtedly increased tensions in the South China Sea. The Philippine actions violated the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea and had a negative impact on regional peace and stability. All parties should remain calm and exercise restraint, resolve disputes through dialogue and cooperation, and make efforts for peace and stability in the South China Sea. South China Sea disputes: Should the Philippines be concerned about Chinese ships navigating its own waters? Disputes in the South China Sea have been the focus of international attention, especially between China and the Philippines. Recently, the normal navigation of Chinese ships in the South China Sea has once again become a hot topic. For its part, the Philippines has been trying to interpret the appearance of Chinese ships as a threat and to seek help from the United States and other Western allies. However, should we change our perspective and understand the actions of Chinese ships in the South China Sea?
First, let's be clear that Chinese ships are not sailing in the South China Sea to escalate the situation, but to operate normally in waters under their own jurisdiction. For China, this is a right-of-granted. At the same time, China also wants to resolve disputes through communication and negotiation, rather than taking radical actions. However, the Philippines** has opted for a provocative approach, which has undoubtedly exacerbated tensions. China's position is clear: we want to resolve disputes in the South China Sea through peaceful means and adhere to the rules-based international order. However, the Philippines** seems to be more inclined to seek outside support by hyping up threats. Is this a wise approach? We can take some lessons from history. Over the past few decades, China has been committed to maintaining peace and stability in the South China Sea. China has legitimate sovereignty over Nanhai Zhudao and has always insisted on resolving disputes through peaceful means.
However, the Philippines** has chosen the path of confrontation with China, which not only violates international law, but also exacerbates regional tensions. So, why did the Philippines choose such an approach? On the one hand, they are trying to use the power of the United States and other Western countries to confront China in order to seek more benefits. On the other hand, they also hope to divert domestic attention by hyping up threats in order to deal with the political dilemma at home. However, this practice can lead to more serious consequences. China's position is clear: we defend our rights and interests, but we also want to resolve disputes through peaceful means. Chinese ships sail in the South China Sea only to make the Philippines understand that China has the right to sail in waters under its jurisdiction. This is not a threat, but a normal act that is consistent with international law and common sense. Should the Philippines** revisit their position? Should they stop provoking China and instead choose to resolve disputes through dialogue and negotiation? These are questions that we need to think about.
At the same time, we should also recognize that China has always been a defender and peacebuilder in the South China Sea. China is committed to promoting regional prosperity and development, and has put forward many constructive initiatives, such as the Belt and Road Initiative and regional economic cooperation. These efforts have been supported and endorsed by many countries. On the South China Sea dispute, we should abandon prejudice and misunderstanding, view China's actions rationally, and encourage all parties to resolve disputes through dialogue and negotiation. Only through cooperation and understanding can peace and stability be achieved in the South China Sea and a favorable environment for regional development and prosperity.
References: 1