In June last year, a couple street shot in Taikoo Li, Chengdu on the short ** platform became popular on the Internet, because the male and female protagonists in ** were the general manager and employees of a subsidiary of a Beijing central enterprise, and their couple clothes at that time even became a popular fashion trend on the Internet. After that, the male protagonist of the street photography ** was investigated and dealt with by the competent department of the central enterprise, and the female protagonist was also terminated from the labor contract by the company and left the company, thus ending the turmoil of the Taikoo Li hand-in-hand door incident caused by a street photography**.
The heroine of the hand-in-hand door incident was banned
Last night, a topic of "Taikoo Li Holding Hands Door Female Party Live Room Blocked" quickly became on the Internet hot search list, because Miss Dong, the female party in the Taikoo Li Hand in Hand Door incident, recently started a live broadcast in Short**, and her live broadcast room was popular with nearly 10,000 people.
It has been eight months since the hand-in-hand door incident, but due to the sensation of the hand-in-hand door incident at that time, Miss Dong is indeed very popular when she starts the live broadcast now, and there are many people who eat melons.
But last night, Miss Dong's live broadcast shared content was very positive, but her live broadcast account was banned by the platform by directly canceling the account, which is not a punishment like banning. Before the ban, Miss Dong's short ** live broadcast account fans were 460,000 people, showing that the reason for the ban is that the account was banned for violating the relevant regulations of the platform.
The ban on her account by the live broadcast platform was very sudden and direct, and there was nothing in her live broadcast at that time that violated the platform's rules, she just shared how she walked out of the darkest moment in the live broadcast room.
Judging from the content of her live broadcast last night, she shared with the audience her feelings after experiencing these events, but it is still very valuable and helpful to many people who have experienced the storm of the Internet, and she told that after those darkest moments, the warmth of her family is very important.
Regarding Miss Dong's live broadcast, netizens' attitudes are also more polarized, some people criticize her morally, thinking that her past is a stain, and such people are not qualified to broadcast live; Others believe that it has been so long since the incident, she has not personally broken the law, and she has also been fired by the unit, and she has got the consequences she deserves, and now the live broadcast is good as long as it does not violate the live broadcast norms.
Is live streaming a basic personal right?
The live broadcast of Miss Dong, the heroine of the Taikoo Li hand-in-hand door incident, is actually very worthy of our consideration, because it is the basis behind it to prove whether our society has a sense of the rule of law.
What are the basic individual rights that a person should have? Is live streaming a basic right of an individual? Should the fundamental rights of individuals be guaranteed? What kind of people are banned from streaming? Is it true that a person with questionable morals or a record of violating the law is not allowed to live stream?
None of our laws and regulations have specific provisions on these issues, and the rules and regulations of live streaming platforms only generally list some laws and regulations, public order and good customs, and other conditions that need to be complied with.
If you refer to the code of conduct of the performing arts industry, the definition of the so-called bad artists and the relevant conventions, it may be that Miss Dong, the party to the hand-in-hand incident, has not yet reached the level of the artist.
If the personal short** live broadcast account is identified as a**, Miss Dong 460,000 fans say too much, say less is not too much, indeed the influence of her live broadcast network traffic will definitely be relatively large, if not banned, it will definitely be the popularity of the live broadcast room of 10,000 people, and it will definitely be counted as a popular anchor on the platform.
But there is also a legal gap here, at least there is no prohibition clause in the current law, which directly stipulates that a person who is identified as having a moral stain by the network is not allowed to have a self-**account.
We know that people with criminal records now also have accounts on the short ** live broadcast platform and also open live broadcasts, and some have become big Internet celebrities.
In Chayu's view, we still have to return to the level of the rule of law, don't shout and kill directly, seal this and that, now in the era of short ** live broadcast, live broadcast should be everyone's basic right, and this basic right should be guaranteed.
Of course, the premise of having the right to live broadcast is to comply with laws, regulations and platform rules during live broadcasting, and if there are detailed rules for guiding live broadcasts for people with illegal and criminal records and moral stains, the process of formulating these rules should require the participation of the public.
If everyone thinks that a person has a bad past and should be deprived of his basic rights, then follow this line of thought and implement it uniformly; If everyone thinks that even if a person has a bad past, they should not be deprived of their basic rights, then they should introduce specific relevant guidance rules, but also make everyone realize that if they do not give others a chance to mend their ways, they may not have a chance to turn over a new leaf in the future.
Miss Dong, the female party involved in the hand-in-hand door incident, is only a tiny individual in the torrent of our times, but it is also a reflection of our entire society's understanding of individual freedom, basic rights, and the awareness of the rule of law.
Do you think it's reasonable and legal to ban her live?