In the early morning of February 18, a factory in Hai'an, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, caused personnel, and this tragedy once again reminds us that formalism kills people. Looking back on the tragedy of Nanxiashu dust in Wujin District, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province a year ago, 8 people died and 8 people were injured, which shocked the whole country. These events are not accidental, but serious consequences of formalism. The construction, operation and maintenance of enterprise safety and environmental protection equipment should be undertaken by a third-party professional company, and the regulator can no longer indulge in the policy of self-deception. We need to take a comprehensive look at the inadequacy of corporate safety standards across the country, as well as the current state of regular maintenance of safety equipment. Enterprise security assessments should be the standard for equipment purchases, not formalistic promises. It should not be overlooked that the occurrence of these incidents is not a problem of poor management in one region, but a hidden danger that is widespread throughout the country. Therefore, we need a complete revolution in enterprise safety regulation to awaken the importance of safety in society.
The underlying reasons behind the incident at the factory are far from simply being blamed on the negligence of individual managers. More fundamentally, there is a tendency of formalism in the current corporate safety and environmental protection. Under the supervision of regulatory authorities at all levels, many companies may just be "passing the motions", rather than really taking safety issues to heart. They may settle for superficial "compliance" while ignoring the actual risks involved in the operation and maintenance of the equipment. This narrow-mindedness leads to a lack of investment in safety and a fragility of the safety management system. Therefore, it is not enough to rely on the supervision and management of enterprises themselves.
To solve this problem, we urgently need to introduce a third-party professional company to carry out the construction, operation and maintenance of enterprise safety and environmental protection equipment. These companies will provide enterprises with a full range of security guarantees with professional vision and technology to ensure the normal operation and timely maintenance of equipment. At the same time, regulators should establish close cooperation with these professional companies to ensure full coverage and comprehensiveness of safety supervision. And not, as in the past, it is just a "formalism" on paper, ignoring the actual security risks.
Regulators should play an active role in the lack of corporate safety standards. They should intensify the review of enterprise safety standards, not only to require enterprises to meet minimum standards, but also to encourage enterprises to continuously improve the level of safety management. In addition, the regulatory authorities should also establish a sound safety traceability mechanism, and take effective measures to rectify the potential safety hazards of the enterprise once it is found. Only in this way can we truly ensure the safety of people's lives and property and avoid the recurrence of similar tragedies.
However, the responsibility for corporate safety supervision does not only lie with the regulatory authorities, but also the enterprises themselves should assume more responsibility. When purchasing equipment, enterprises should fully consider the factors of safety assessment, rather than just pursuing the best cheapness and equipment efficiency. In addition, enterprises should also strengthen the training and assessment of safety management personnel to ensure that they have sufficient safety management knowledge and skills. Only by working together with regulatory authorities and third-party professional companies can a truly safe and reliable production environment be established.
To sum up, enterprise security is a complex system engineering that cannot simply be blamed on the negligence of one party. We need a comprehensive revolution in enterprise safety supervision, bringing in third-party professional companies, strengthening the audit and traceability of enterprise security standards, and strengthening the security management and training of enterprises themselves. Only in this way can we truly ensure the safety of people's lives and property and avoid the recurrence of similar tragedies. Formalism harms people's lives, and only truly professional supervision can protect people's lives.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program