In the Syrian civil war, the refugees did not go to Russia, the financier and backer behind Assad, nor to their neighboring Arab brother countries, and even Turkey at that time opened its borders and let refugees go to Europe as bargaining chips in exchange for the European Union's consent to its accession.
Of course, some people will say that because the EU is richer and more developed than Russia and Arab countries, refugees can get better material relief in Europe, which does not mean that refugees yearn for Europe.
The question is, wealth and development are internal to people, if you are hostile to outsiders like them, and you go to other people's land, will people give you a good face? If you have a rich enmity with the dog in the village, even if you were a family 500 years ago, and one day your family is too poor to open the pot, are you still willing to go to his house and ask for a bite to eat?
If people accept you, is it a good person, and you are not so authentic? If there is such introspection, it may be a big step towards civilization!
Of course, the leader of their country will not go to Europe, he is going to Russia, he wants guns, guns and cannons to protect, and it is true that he and the Emperor are real allies. And I don't see any special friendship between the two peoples.
Look, here in the people, what "clash of civilizations", the clash of ideologies, surnames, societies, and capitalists does not exist, if the state truly respects the will of the people, there will be no hostile countries or ** countries in the world, only those privileged strata will regard all those who oppose their privileges as enemies, and use their privileges to raise these opponents of their privileges to the enemies of the state!