Lei Jun dried the car late at night, and netizens bluntly said that it was like a taxi, which was quite cheap
Your attention is my nurturing agent, attract attention, learn more about finance, learn about finance, and understand finance.
Introductory. Lei Jun, the founder of Xiaomi, recently released a real car picture of the company's first car, the Xiaomi Su7, showing the Xiaomi Su7 on a rainy night. However, this behavior has sparked heated discussions and controversies among netizens about the appearance of the car, especially in terms of exterior design, which is even more intense. During the discussion, netizens clearly disagreed on the aesthetics of the Xiaomi Su7. Some netizens thought that the car looked too much like a taxi, giving it a cheap feel. But there are also some netizens who approve of its appearance and vigorously refute the skeptics. This controversy has pushed the exterior design of the Xiaomi Su7 to the forefront, sparking thinking and discussion about the aesthetics of the car's appearance. Between official statements, professional reviews, and comparisons with other car brands, I have some personal reflections and perceptions about this controversy and the cultural clash behind it.
Differences and fortunes behind the controversy over appearance.
1) Appearance disputes.
The controversy over the appearance of the Xiaomi Su7 mainly centers on its color and overall design. Some users believe that the car looks too much like a taxi and feels cheap. This view reflects the conservative nature of traditional aesthetics. However, some netizens praised its appearance, thinking that the design was novel and beautiful. These different points of view all became the subject of commentary, which made the controversy even more interesting.
2.Formal declaration and professional assessment.
In order to clarify the controversy over the appearance of the Xiaomi Su7, Xiaomi officials quickly responded. They say that the Xiaomi Su7 is designed with attention"Beautiful, durable, and standing the test of time"and other factors, and expressed confidence in the design. In addition, the world-renowned car designer Chris Bangle also gave a positive review of the Xiaomi Su7, considering it a complete car without excessive design. This official statement, as well as the evaluation of professionals, gave a positive voice to the Xiaomi Su7 and also added credibility to the design of the car.
3.Comparison with other brands.
Amid the controversy, attention has turned to other car brands, especially models similar to the Xiaomi Su7. Tesla Modely has been one of the spotlights, with some netizens pointing out that the Modely has similar exterior features, prompting more rhetorical questions about the Xiaomi Su7's appearance. This act of contrast further complicates the controversy.
Reflections on the clash of cultures.
1.Tradition meets the future.
The controversy over the appearance of the Xiaomi Su7 has sparked reflection on the culture clash behind the car's design. On the one hand, some have accused it of looking like a taxi, embodying a traditional conventional aesthetic. On the other hand, the positive reviews of professional designer Christ-Bangle convey an avant-garde and futuristic vibe. This is the collision of tradition and the future, the contest between classic and modern.
2.Anxiety about new things.
In the midst of the controversy, when comparing the Xiaomi Su7 with other brands, the anxiety in the face of something new was highlighted. This anxiety is often caused by ignorance and resistance to innovation. The long-term goal of the Xiaomi Su7 is to become a classic, which is a challenge to the traditional standard of automotive aesthetics and an affirmation of the creator's courage to take a step.
3.Changes in car design.
As a part of culture, automotive design is also undergoing significant changes in the era of rapid technological development. The battle over the appearance of the Xiaomi Su7 is not only a debate over the appearance of the car, but also a contest between tradition and modernity, conservatism and innovation. Our view of this debate may reflect our attitude towards the future and our acceptance of change.
Summary. The controversy over the appearance of the Xiaomi Su7 has sparked a discussion about the culture clash behind the car's design. In the midst of the controversy, traditional aesthetics clash with avant-garde design, and people's anxiety between tradition and innovation seems to be even stronger. Xiaomi's official stance and professional reviews give the Xiaomi Su7 a positive voice, but the contrast with other brands complicates the controversy. However, automotive design, as part of the culture, is undergoing profound changes. Our attitudes and perceptions of this controversy will reflect expectations for the future and acceptance of change. In this regard, we need to keep an open mind and actively explore and adapt to the new aesthetic concepts brought about by the changes in automotive design.
If you like, you can follow me**Oh, I regularly share financial advice with you and discuss financial topics.