Text Assassin. After the defeat of the United States in Afghanistan, some Western ** bluntly said that Western interventionism led by the United States has been put to an end. Indeed, some countries that once made promises to the United States now dare to say "no." In Central Asia in particular, the United States does not seem to be taking the United States seriously because of the loss of its military and political influence in the region.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently wrote a letter to Kyrgyzstan's Zhaparov, criticizing the country's internal affairs, thus angering Zhaparov. According to Wenhui.com, Kyrgyzstan's press secretary recently published a reply letter from Zhaparov to Blinken on social media, warning the United States not to interfere in the country's internal affairs.
A few days ago, in a letter to Zhaparov, Blinken "expressed concern" about the amendments to the Law on Non-Profit Organizations that are being considered by the country's parliament. Blinken declared that these so-called "non-profit non-profit organizations" funded by the United States and European countries in Kyrgyzstan are an important part of the country's democracy. Thus, the American side warns that if the document is put into practice, it will "endanger one of your country's greatest assets."
Many non-Western countries know that these non-governmental organizations dressed in the cloak of "democracy and human rights" are actually political interests funded by Western countries and arranged in other countries. According to the consistent practice of the West towards many countries, when the host country is "disobedient", the West will often use these organizations to lead the rhythm, provoke political disputes and even color revolutions, and achieve the political goals they need. Countries such as Cambodia, Ukraine, Russia and Belarus have all been victims.
It is reported that the Kyrgyzstan parliament is deliberating the relevant law, requiring these Western organizations to "abide by the country's constitution and legal norms and ensure the transparency of their activities." Zhaparov said that the development of the relevant law is aimed at clarifying and simplifying the activities of relevant organizations operating in the country, giving the relevant departments of the country the right to control the funds, how and how to use the funds of these non-organizations.
Kyrgyzstan's amendments to the relevant bills have obviously stepped on the lung tubes of Western countries. Therefore, it is not only Blinken who made threats, according to Xinhua News Agency, Kyrgyzstan revised the relevant bills, which caused sharp criticism from the European Union, the United States Agency for International Development, the OSCE, the US Embassy and many other Western **. It can be seen from this that the relevant actions of the Kyrgyzstan parliament have already made the West feel uneasy, because they know it. Once the country decides to take action against these non-organizations, it is equivalent to cutting off their interference in the internal affairs of the country.
In order to thwart the parliament's consideration of the bill, Blinken publicly threatened in the letter that the law would jeopardize Kyrgyzstan's opportunities to carry out projects through these "non-profit organizations" with the support of U.S. and international partners. Finally, the letter also warned that the United States and its allies are "very concerned" about the law and are considering the possibility of terminating their activities in Kyrgyzstan.
Blinken's threats in the letter are naked, and they are intended to force the government to stop "endangering" these Western organizations by threatening to end their support for programs such as health care and education in Kyrgyzstan. However, Zhaparov ridiculed the United States for introducing the "Foreign Person Registration Law": What the United States can do, why can't Kyrgyzstan do it. In addition, he "deplored" Blinken's wanton meddling in the country's internal affairs.
In fact, Kyrgyzstan's decision to take action against non-** organizations in its territory is not because they want to turn against the West, but out of the consideration of maintaining stability and stability. What's more, this kind of thing has been done by many countries before, and the effect has been particularly good. For example, countries such as Cambodia, Russia, and Belarus have all taken action to eradicate these "harmful spirits" in order to ensure national security and stability.