Recently, a friend of the author experienced a self-examination of the "seven seriousness" in the school, and gained a bunch of rectification opinions, many of which are very close to an Internet buzzword:It's not very hurtful, and it's extremely insulting.
Speaking of self-examination and self-correction, there is no problem with the system itself, as long as it is implemented well, it can also effectively improve the quality of education and teaching. But no, this self-examination experienced by my friend actually includes many self-examinationsThe motivation has nothing to do with improving the quality of education and teaching, and it is only to accumulate information to cope with supervision and inspection, so the results are more and more paradoxical
For example, in the first article, the date record of a workbook is scribbled, and it is recommended to improve. What do you mean? That is to say, the teacher has to write down a clear date after grading the homework. Forgive me for being stupid, even after years of doing this, I still don't know the meaning and value of doing this. Does the completion of assignments or the absence of dates have the slightest impact on the quality of teaching? The answer is resoundingly no. So what's the point? This is indeed there, at least it can reflect the majesty of power - you see, what a pleasure it is for teachers not to dare to disobey an order!
There are two reasons why my friend's time memory is sloppy, the first is that the time is very tight, especially in the context of the reality that chores crowd out a lot of working time; What's more, this request is meaningless, worthless, and unreasonable, even if everyone has to write it because of obscenity, it must be written reluctantly. Of course, it is not surprising that there is no high quality writing in this state of mind.
Another example is the second article, the essay correction comments are relatively short, and it is recommended to improve. This article is aimed at the lack of length of friends' comments, and the implication is that the more comments and the longer the batch, the higher the quality of the batch; If there are few comments from friends, the quality will naturally be low, which belongs to the category that must be rectified.
Only a rigid evaluation system can draw such a strange conclusionThe quality of essay correction is focused on accuracy, and it is not necessarily related to length. And the effort should be made by the student to draft and revise.
Only a rigid evaluation system can draw such a strange conclusionThe quality of essay correction is focused on accuracy, and it is not necessarily related to length. Moreover, the effort should be put into the students' drafting and revision, so as to effectively improve their homework level, and the transcription should be of higher quality after completion, but it still needs to be revised at large length? Do you want to prove that teachers are incompetent, or are they not serious about their work? I don't know what to call for such a request!
There is also an interesting revision, which is about the shortcomings in lesson preparationIt is pointed out that the amount of reflection after class is not enough and needs to be made up. This is the most bizarre requirement bred in the strange soil.
What is post-class reflection? It is the teacher's self-rumination of the gains and losses in the classroom, which is as personal as the feeling of reading, which cannot be replicated or unified. The higher-level authorities can advocate that everyone feel and have a purpose, but they should never impose a mandatory rule that everyone must participate in the class, otherwise it will definitely be harmful and useless.
However, once upon a time, there was a climber who made such a harmful thing with a stroke of a pen, and it was mandatory that all front-line teachers must write post-teaching reflections in every lesson, and they must also write on the designated part with a pen of a specified color for future reference. Because no one has corrected this, all kinds of nonsensical additional requirements have been developedFor example, the number of words, the content, the handwriting and even the full coverage of the discipline.
What is full subject coverage? This means that you need to write reflections on several subjects when you take a few subjects, whether it is a main course or a part-time course, you must treat them equally. As for how teachers do it and how much precious time they waste, it's none of their business. Is this the rhythm of a death rush on the road of formalism and never looking back? The poor front-line teachers have been broken through the bottom line again and again by these guys who eat people and don't do personnel, and they have been pushed to the edge of the cliff again and again.
Many people don't explode in silence, which is something that only a few hard people can do, but they can choose to die in the center of silence. Education will also lose its spirituality in the disappointment and even despair of most people, and eventually become a pool of stagnant water, just like the backwater is now.
In short, supervision and inspection are not useless, but must be really aimed at promoting the progress of education and teaching, otherwise they are playing hooligan on education, and the so-called supervision is carried out purely for the sake of fawning over power, which is harmful to education and teachers. If this kind of formalism is not eradicated, education will not be able to emerge for a long time.
A friend said that someone in her work group confirmed a message with the leader, and she had to write reflections on all part-time classes. Then a message popped up in the group, which was left by the colleague who left a bunch of opinions on the homework for the preparation of the class, she was crying about the fact that there are several subjects to prepare for the course, which means that she has to write a number of after-class reflections, and a big crying avatar truly conveys her state of mind at the moment, sighing, unwilling to do it but having to do it.
Maybe she should also reflect on it, if it weren't for a large group of people intentionally or unintentionally fueling formalism, would this thing be so rampantIs that a shot in the foot?
Maybe she should also reflect on it, if it weren't for a large group of people intentionally or unintentionally fueling formalism, would this thing be so rampantIs that a shot in the foot?
Front-line teachers just want to attend classes quietly and pass on everything they have learned in their lives to their studentsWhy is it that there is always a counter-current that does not give teachers such a chance, but desperately tries to instrumentalize living people? I really don't understand why I did this!
*From the Internet, infringement and deletion).