Recently, the issue of the American Civil War has continued to attract attention around the world. The U.S. military and the Texas National Guard are already in a high-level standoff, and tensions between the two sides are escalating. In support of Texas, 25 states sent National Guards to the front. A steady stream of military equipment was also sent to Texas, including at least 400 Humvees, 72 M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles and 48 M109 self-propelled howitzers. Faced with this increasingly dire situation, the Texas governor declared a "state of war." 
Back in history, in 1836, the Republic of Texas broke out in the war with Mexico, and Texas successfully defeated the Mexican army and declared independence. However, the international community did not recognize the independence of Texas. It was not until 1845 that the United States** signed the Texas-USA Treaty with the Republic of Texas, which recognized the independence of Texas and agreed on the borders. In the same year, the U.S. Congress passed the Texas Accession Act, officially annexing the Republic of Texas to the United States and becoming the 28th state of the United States. 
Although Texas has been incorporated into the United States for many years, there has always been a tendency for the state to become independent. There is a deep historical, cultural and geographical background behind this. Once part of Mexico, Texas declared independence as a republic in 1836. Despite later joining the United States in 1845, Texans have maintained an identity and cultural connection to Mexico. Thus, one of the main reasons for the Texas independence movement was identification with Mexico and dissatisfaction with the United States. 
In recent years, Texas' propensity for independence has strengthened, largely because of the state's dissatisfaction with the policies of the United States** and its distrust of the management and decision-making of the federal **. The resurgence of Texas' independence leaning this time is closely related to the upcoming 2024 United States** and Biden**'s border policy. In order to get more votes in the election, Biden has taken an extremely open attitude towards illegal immigration. This policy has led to an influx of immigrants from all over the world into the United States, and Texas has borne the brunt of this pressure. Texans, who had lived a peaceful life here, suddenly found that the fruits of their labor were eroded by Biden** and the influx of immigrants. The arrival of these immigrants has put unprecedented pressure on jobs, social services, and infrastructure in Texas. 
For Texans, the United States should be an America that belongs to the people of each state, not just an America that "moistens people" all over the world. They believe that the United States should not become a tool used by Democratic bureaucrats to bribe immigrants for their own personal gain. Now, they see an opportunity to raise their arms, because Trump is preparing to run again, and the public is tired of Biden's hypocrisy and double standards in recent years. Faced with this situation, Biden took a tough stance and directly canceled all LNG projects. Texas is the largest oil and gas exporting state in the United States, and Biden's move is undoubtedly an economic sanction against Texas. It is rare in history for a country to impose economic sanctions on a state in the country, and the last time a similar situation occurred was during the American Civil War. 
The sanctions sparked a backlash among Texans, who saw it as a serious blow to the Texas economy. One of the pillars of Texas' economy is the energy industry, and Biden's move is undoubtedly a heavy blow to the Texas economy. In addition, the sanctions have exacerbated tensions between Texas and the Federation. In this situation, Texas** and the people began to seek the path of independence or self-government. They believe that only through independence or autonomy can they get rid of the shackles and interference of the federation and safeguard their economic interests and sovereignty. This view is gaining more and more support and response within Texas. 
Texas is as important in the United States as Russia was in the Soviet Union. Historically, the cowboys of Texas have made a lot of money for the United States through their unremitting efforts, making the state an important military industrial center and a major source of troops in the United States. After years of development, Texas' economy has become the second largest in the United States, second only to California. In this vast land, there are many kinds of industries, and it is the core area of the United States and high-tech manufacturing. Today, Texas has a population of nearly 30 million, which is about the same as Poland, but its economic power and international influence far exceed that of Poland. Many of the world's top 500 companies gather here, highlighting the business vitality and economic strength of Texas. In addition, Texas is home to two major U.S. Army facilities and is home to the headquarters of the National Space Administration. 
This time the situation is different from the "Red Neck"** campaign three years ago. Trump's approval ratings were indeed at a low point at the time, and the "redneck" group, which consisted mainly of stragglers and cosplay enthusiasts, lacked organization and discipline to compete with the regular army and police. This time, however, the governors of the "red states" showed a spirit of unity, and the National Guard in their hands was a military force to be reckoned with. These militias are well-equipped and have land combat equipment such as M1A2 main battle tanks and M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, which are comparable to the US military, as well as air support forces such as F-22, F-35, F-15, F-16, A-10C, AC-130, and B-2. The military equipment at their disposal is not much different from that of the US military, which means that the US federal ** cannot simply use force to suppress them. If the federal government chooses to compromise or back down, the future of the United States could be even more jeopardistic, as it will raise questions about the very existence of the federal government. 
Just as the Soviet Union collapsed, can the United States also **? Texas Governor Abbott should stand firmly at the forefront of history and seize the opportunity at the right time, place and people. We should not underestimate the strength of the United States, but we should also not blindly assume that its hegemonic position is unshakable. The United States, although a giant, is also a half-flawed and unresponsive giant. If we don't give enough push, it may still be there for posturing. But with a little push, it can quickly collapse. Governor Abbott has the courage and determination of Yeltsin, and as long as he dares to take risks and fight, he may become the father of the "Lone Star Republic" and leave a lasting name. 
Some netizens said that the beginning of civil strife in the United States is definitely the most beautiful boy in today's social **. It is the most beautiful scenery for the vast majority of people in the international community. I believe that more states will engage in armed confrontation with the US authorities in the future, and the United States can really be said to have created too deep evil to live, which is really good news and deserves to be celebrated by the whole world!