Germany "shot" at chip producers in the United States!
Starting in 2022, the ban on car sales around the world is like a storm. At the same time, Germany has also indicated its ban on tobacco products. According to the Financial Times, a German court recently ruled that Intel was suspected of infringing on R2 companies in the United States. Intel, a major chip maker, has been banned from sale in Germany, and it will also hit companies that use Intel chips, such as Dell and Hewlett-Packard. But Intel refused to accept the infringement, saying it would file a lawsuit. The lawsuit is a significant event for the American company R2, which is preparing to fight Intel to the death in court. Although ostensibly to deal with R2, it is quite possible that Germany will cancel this order with the help of external circumstances. Since Intel was acquitted in the U.S. and R2 won the case in Europe, we can't help but question the local court's ruling. In other words, the US court's ruling provides a way for Germany to deny the technology access to the European market. Germany's approach is unclear. One thing is certain, however, that the conclusions published by the United States are meaningless in the eyes of Germany. In any case, disputes between American companies will involve Germany, and there will always be a final outcome. However, it is still inconclusive whether Intel has infringed copyright. The reasons for this dispute are quite complex. Intel originally planned to take a stake in R2 in 2015 because of its technological advantages in chips. Prior to the conclusion of this joint action, R2 had also conducted a discussion with Intel's patent experts on the relevant technical documents**. Subsequently, Intel unilaterally suspended the agreement, which led to a dispute. Later, R2 filed several more infringement lawsuits against Intel. In addition, the German court's ruling makes it clear that the invention did exist, but it was considered invalid by the United States. So people began to wonder why there was such a big difference between the American district court and the German court, and whether there was any unfair district court in between. In either case, the most important question is whether Germany** would have withdrawn the injunction if Intel had been appealing. That's how fate fits.
In the U.S. R2 v. Intel patent case, the German court's ruling is thought-provoking.
A German court ruled on a patent dispute between Intel and the U.S. R2 that barred the sale of many chips produced by Intel into Germany. This case has made us reflect on how we can better protect our patent rights. One party, R2 of the United States, filed a lawsuit in a German court on the grounds of infringement by Intel. Intel, on the other hand, has vehemently rejected the accusations about the right and said it would file a lawsuit. At the heart of the argument is whether the patent is valid. The invention was ruled illegal in the United States, while Germany won the case. So, does this mean that China's legislation has regional differences in the determination of patent rights? Or are intellectual property more tightly protected by the German courts? Regardless of the reason, the ruling in this case is of great significance for future patent disputes and the protection of intellectual property rights. This has led to a reflection on the issue of patent collaboration among multinational enterprises. Therefore, when enterprises carry out technological innovation, they should make full use of their own intellectual property rights to protect their intellectual property rights, so as to reduce disputes over intellectual property rights.
From the perspective of patent disputes, the impact on the economy.
Patent disputes not only involve the protection of intellectual property rights, but also involve the development of society as a whole. For Intel, the impact of the ban in Germany is clear. Intel Corporation is the world's largest producer of integrated circuits, and its products are used in a variety of industries, especially big computer companies like Dell and HP. In addition, Germany's ban on cars will also have a certain impact on the above-mentioned companies, which will have a greater impact on the entire world's industrial chain. In addition, due to the patent disputes, there are many doubts and doubts within the industry, which makes many companies cautious when dealing with cooperation with manufacturers. In order to maintain the vitality of technological innovation and market competitiveness of enterprises, in China, the settlement of patent disputes in China should pay more attention to fairness and balance of interests.
My views and thoughts.
In China, patent rights are a very meaningful legal system. With regard to the patent dispute between Intel and R2, I believe that the court should make a fair ruling on this issue in order to protect the fairness of the rights of all parties. On this basis, it is also necessary to clarify the differences between countries in terms of patent recognition and coordinate them in order to avoid the emergence of such disputes as much as possible. In addition, when carrying out technological innovation, it is also necessary to pay attention to the evaluation of patent risks to prevent potential risks. Fourth, enterprises and enterprises should pay more attention to intellectual property rights and create an environment conducive to scientific and technological progress and economic development. Sustainable development of the world economy can only be achieved on the basis of fairness, justice and balance of interests.