This year, peasants' land can be returned to the collective or self-managed, either of which
The dilemma faced by the villagers: farming by themselves or together.
On Chinese New Year's Eve, the whole village was filled with a joyful atmosphere, but it was interrupted by an announcement. The "Opinions" pointed out that starting from 2021, villagers can independently manage the contracted land according to the wishes of the "two village committees", or they can return it to the collective and let them manage it themselves. This choice is very difficult for the people in the village, because during the Spring Festival, they not only have to face difficult choices, but also have to make a short-term choice: whether to keep another acre of land, or return the land.
This decision made the originally jubilant village a little more worried. For a long time, the villagers have farmed and managed their own fields, although their income is based on their own labor, and they cannot be said to be rich and expensive, but at least they can eat and clothe themselves. However, the villagers were puzzled by not understanding why the land was returned to the cooperative, and how to return it. Countless questions plagued the villagers: what will happen to their livelihood after returning the land? Won't the standard of living of the repatriated peasants be lowered as a result? These are all questions that must be answered, and without this answer, it is impossible to get the contractor to return the land. Land is the foundation and most crucial part of farmers' lives, and the villagers have heard of the origin of "collective management", and they naturally know that in the 1960s, in the era of "big pot rice", famine and poverty were their lingering memories. What if they were to be reverted to a collective management model?
As soon as the announcement came out, the whole village fell silent. Everyone was thinking about what to do with it, and no one wanted to be the first to hand over their little brother. The land is fundamental to the farmer's livelihood, and they fear losing this pillar. Because of this, everyone is reluctant to stand up, and no one is willing to throw the crab in front of them on the ground and hand over their little brother.
Serious question: Go to **?
The arguments faced by the villagers are not unfounded. For rural households, cultivated land is the most basic necessity of life and the main support for their life and development. For a long time, farmers have made a living from self-cultivation and self-management, and although their income depends to a certain extent on individual diligence and opportunities, at least they can ensure that they have no worries about food and clothing. Therefore, now that the villagers' committee suddenly asks them to return the land, they are of course very unhappy and worried. This fear is not unfounded, because the farmer did not live a prosperous life because of his experience of working together, but was tormented by poverty and hunger. For farmers, the last thing they want is a reduction in their living conditions.
Free-farming and co-farming have their own advantages and disadvantages. Free-for-all farming allows farmers to make choices based on their actual conditions and market needs, but it also carries great risks and uncertain incomes. However, although scale and specialization can be realized, it restricts the autonomy of rural households and the flexibility of income distribution. As far as the peasants are concerned, whether there is a better way out depends on whether there is a better way out. In order to ensure that the livelihood of farmers who have returned farmland to farmland is not affected, it is necessary to establish a fair and reasonable benefit distribution system. At the same time, in order to achieve the sustainable development of rural households, it is also necessary to have good policy support and market guarantees.
Potential risks of agricultural land problems - ensuring the sustainable development of farmers.
Whether it is self-management or joint management, it is necessary to achieve sustainable development from the perspective of the development of the farmers themselves. After the land is returned, the peasants worry about their own survival and security, and fear that their quality of life will be affected, and thus lose their autonomy. In this regard, the rights and interests of rural households should be protected at different levels to ensure their sustainable development.
First of all, the state should formulate a clear system for the transfer of farmland to ensure that farmers whose farmland has been returned to farmland can obtain reasonable costs for the transfer of farmland, and define in detail the time limit and conditions for the transfer of farmland. At the same time, the state should also introduce relevant agricultural support policies, provide technical training to rural households, conduct marketing to rural households, and provide them with a certain degree of economic, scientific and technological support to ensure the sustainable and healthy development of rural households.
Second, village-level organizations should take the initiative to guide villagers to participate in the formation of "professional cooperatives" and "professional cooperatives", so that rural households can achieve "joint construction and co-governance", "joint construction and joint governance", and "joint construction and joint governance". Cooperatives can form economies of scale, enhance their competitiveness in the market, and increase the income of rural households.
At the same time, it is necessary to improve the supervision and management system of village-level organizations to ensure the fairness and transparency of the right to use rural homesteads. At the same time, it is necessary to intensify the management of the right to use homestead land in rural areas and avoid problems such as illegal circulation and illegal resale of homestead land use rights. At the same time, the villagers' committees should also make public the operation of the cooperatives to the masses, so that they can truly benefit from them and strengthen their trust in the cooperatives.
All in all, whether it is self-planting or collective unified planting, it is necessary to ensure the development of farmers and ensure their quality of life, which requires the development of farmers and the village committee to formulate corresponding policies and measures to ensure that farmers' rights are effectively protected, give them more development opportunities and resource support, so as to promote the sustainable development of agriculture.
In short, whether the farmers can decide for themselves or return it to the collective is a very difficult issue. The expropriation of rural homesteads directly affects the living conditions of peasant households, and is an issue that must be taken seriously by the first level and villagers' committees at all levels. In order to ensure the development and sustainable development of rural households, it is necessary to formulate clear agricultural land transfer and agricultural support, and provide long-term technical training and market support for rural households. On this basis, through the organizational role of the villagers' committee, a new form of villagers' self-governance organization is constructed to realize the sharing of resources and benefits. In the process of transferring the right to use rural homesteads, the regulatory authorities should strengthen the management of the right to use the homestead to ensure the fairness and openness of the right to use the homestead; In order to provide more development opportunities for rural households and promote the sustainable development of the rural economy, multi-party cooperation is needed. Only in this way will the peasants have greater room for survival and security in their future choices, and this will lay the foundation for their future.