For some people, "postgraduate entrance examination" does not have objective material bonuses, and it will even make your life a mess.
For some people, the "graduate school entrance examination" is useful, and they can even change their lives against the sky.
I do not recommend going to graduate school in the following cases:
1.Some people who originally had too low academic qualifications, junior colleges, and even high school dropouts, and the "vast majority" of the junior high school dropout group.
All roads lead to Rome, and you who have missed the ** period of "academic promotion", if you return to this road, the material price you have to pay is much higher than that of ordinary students. What's even more disgusting is that even if you are one of the very few "counterattackers", you will soon experience a new round of discrimination chain. In addition, the dividend of high education in society is declining. You end up with a substance bonus that is much lower than expected.
Instead of this, it is better to go directly to the society and fight.
2.Those who are too old and have average financial means.
There are 2 realistic conditions here:
1.If you are too old, generally higher than 29 years old, you will already start to see that even if you go ashore, it will become not cost-effective in terms of material bonuses. If it is higher, the bonus will be lower, and it will even become a magic barrier, delaying your family life.
2.The financial ability is too poor, the older you are, the smaller the actual benefits of going ashore, and because you have been out of the state of student for a long time, the postgraduate entrance examination is equivalent to re-learning for you, the time cost and material cost, and the cost of lost work, add up, this account will be far higher than that of fresh graduates, more than 10 times higher. Even if you succeed, there is a high probability that you can only get into a very poor school, or take the exam for many years. In one sentence, "not cost-effective".
3.Lazy and stupid people.
stupid, "diligence can make up for clumsiness"; Lazy, if you are smart, you have a chance.
I'm afraid of people who are lazy and stupid. Why this kind of person is not cost-effective, there should be no need to explain, there is only one reason, unless you are lucky, it is impossible to get in.
Let's talk about who is useful for the graduate school entrance examination.
1.People under the age of 25 who are in other majors, but who are extremely passionate about this profession.
The postgraduate entrance examination can instantly change the group around you, which is the most cost-effective and the most advanced way to enter the industry.
2.Students under the age of 25 who are "very good at cultural class" or "very good at drawing".
The postgraduate entrance examination is mainly to take 4 subjects, which are divided into 2 categories, that is, cultural courses and painting, and you are originally very strong in one of them, so as long as you get the other one, you can be admitted. The cost of learning is very low, and you get a title for nothing, don't don't want it in vain.
3.People who have a solid family background and just want to do big things in the industry.
If you don't have material pressure and don't want to start from the bottom, then going abroad for the postgraduate entrance examination is indeed the most realistic and stable upward channel.
To add: There are still many people who are in the situation that it is okay to go to graduate school or not, so I won't go into details.
There are 10,000 reasons for going to graduate school, and there are 10,000 reasons for not going to graduate school.
Educational explosive style making machine