In the sea of social **, a blogger with 200,000 followers dared to laugh at a colleague with 8 million followers just because the latter used a Xiaomi mobile phone, which is undoubtedly a misjudgment of taste.
"Brother Hongmeng Zhao", who has an annual income of 800,000, scoffed at Chen Zhen's Xiaomi 14, thinking that it was not good enough. However, this ridicule seems rather absurd, because in Chen Zhen's view, the mobile phone is first and foremost a tool, not a status symbol. He chose the Xiaomi Mi 14 Standard Edition because it is light and easy to use, and although it is not a flagship model, it excels in all aspects. Chen Zhen firmly believes that both Xiaomi and Huawei are excellent brands, and there is no grade of high or low.
He satirizes those who focus too much on outward symbols, suggesting that they may need a cell phone to prove their worth.
Brother Hongmeng Zhao's ridicule not only failed to achieve its goal, but instead attracted a strong counterattack from Chen Zhen. Chen Zhen pointed out that if someone really thinks that a phone can represent identity, then it is better to remain silent so as not to expose their most expensive item to prove their identity — perhaps their only luxury.
This controversy has sparked heated discussions among netizens, and some even questioned whether the name "Brother Hongmeng Zhao" will have a negative impact on Huawei.
After all, it is indeed intriguing whether a person who calls himself "HarmonyOS" publicly belittles other brands in line with Huawei's official position. In this story, we see a debate about taste vs. identity, and a blogger's deep understanding of the true value of mobile phones. Chen Zhen's response not only defended his choice, but also showed the world what true confidence and taste are. Xiaomi