The sanctions were ineffective, and Sullivan turned to persuade China to stop conducting research and development
Description: In his latest speech, Sullivan warned against China's technological prowess, arguing that sanctions will not change China and that persuasion is a more effective strategy. He called on China to end its independent research and development and use its technological partnership with the United States to benefit China for a century.
Hello everyone, some time ago, we were going to talk about a hot topic that was sparked by Sullivan's speech some time ago. He insisted that sanctions could not be persuaded in exchange for sanctions, and that China must give up independent research and development, take advantage of the advantages of US technical cooperation, and move towards a century of glory in the field of science and technology.
Although sanctions can exert pressure on some countries, it is difficult for a country like China, which has a huge market and strong scientific and technological strength, to play a key role. Sullivan believes that China has made great achievements in scientific and technological innovation and has gradually become an important participant in the global scientific and technological competition. As a result, sanctions alone are unlikely to change China's trajectory.
Instead, Sullivan tended to resort to persuasion tactics. He hopes that China will end its independent research and development and establish closer technological cooperation with the United States. Sullivan believes that the United States has the world's leading scientific and technological strength, and through cooperation, China's scientific and technological strength will be combined with the scientific and technological strength of the United States, which will enable China to obtain long-term benefits in scientific and technological development.
Sullivan also explained that scientific and technological cooperation can not only speed up the process of scientific and technological innovation, but also avoid the duplication of resources and labor. By sharing scientific and technological achievements and experiences, China and the United States can complement each other's strengths and achieve a win-win situation. He also stressed the importance of working together to address global issues such as climate change and disease governance, which can only be addressed through global collaboration.
Of course, Sullivan's views have also sparked some controversy and skepticism. Some argue that over-reliance on U.S. scientific and technological cooperation could lead to a loss of independence and passivity in China's scientific and technological development. In addition, it remains to be seen whether the United States is really willing to engage in in-depth cooperation with China in the current context of tensions between China and the United States.
In conclusion, Sullivan's speech attracted a lot of attention. He urged China to abandon independent research and development and move to scientific and technological cooperation, a persuasive strategy that is undoubtedly the more pragmatic option. Although sanctions can sometimes play a role, it is only through solid persuasion and joint cooperation that scientific and technological progress can be promoted and a win-win situation can be achieved. It remains to be seen how China-US science and technology cooperation will develop in the future and whether it will bring broader development prospects to the two countries.