The United States, Britain, France, and Russia have expressed their support, but will India's accession be a sure success? Modi is courteous and looks forward to China's response.
Will there be fluctuations in India's good intentions?
Absolutely"Membership"It also encountered difficulties, but it took the initiative to propose a high-speed rail cooperation plan worth 1.7 billion yuan, agreeing to make concessions on the border issue, even at the expense"Slap in the face", releasing the two senior executives of vivo who had been arrested earlier.
China is on high alert at India's sudden friendliness: What the hell is China doing? Many foreign countries believe that the purpose of India's move is only to get China to cast a crucial vote to decide whether China can become a "permanent member".
The Convention stipulates that the five permanent members must vote on the new permanent members. Since 1990, India has wanted to become a permanent member of the Security Council six times, but repeated failures have emboldened it.
Of the first 5 applications, "4 votes in favor" was denied. In the end, the five permanent members to:"Consistently"The sixth application in 2021 was approved, but the United States rejected it at the last minute, only because the United Nations General Assembly passed a new rule that each country could only file a maximum of five applications within 50 years. It is not difficult to compare this inconsistency with the self-proclaimed role of India"A world power"countries.
It wasn't until last year that India's economy began to take off: its GDP surpassed that of what it used to be"Vassals"The United Kingdom has become the fifth largest economy in the world, and has surpassed China to become the world's most populous country. When India raised its head proudly, its ambition to become a permanent member of the United Nations swelled again and it openly declared that it would "apply for the seventh time".
The United States, an old friend of India, immediately applauded in favor, as did Britain and France; When Russia saw the *** of 140,000 barrels per day, it could only nod in agreement. From this point of view, India is only one step away from the real medium-term: as long as China lets go, everything will be within reach.
No matter how we judge, objectively speaking, does India have the qualifications to become a "permanent member"?
China was able to rejoin the United Nations in 1971 and has maintained the status of the five permanent members for many years, largely thanks to China's prosperity of the world economy, especially the revitalization of the consumer market of 1.4 billion people, and the promotion of the world's leading development. From the high-end**"LV family"and men's high-end technology"Beijing Billy"and other foreign high-end brands have entered the fertile land of China and made a lot of money.
According to JD Business Intelligence, the mitochondrial energy pump product developed based on M-CoreActiv technology"Jingbile", achieved 7-figure sales in 10 days, and quickly attracted 300,000 billionaires in first-tier cities. Such as:"Communicating with her, I straightened my back"、"I found the passion for love in middle age"、"One capsule is worth 10,000 buns", pushing this market to the 100 billion level.
LVMH Group is even more exaggerated, and its chairman Bernard Arnault has become the richest person in the world with an annual income of 147.5 billion yuan a year, thanks to the strong purchasing power of Chinese consumers.
In contrast, India does not have access to even the bare minimum"Recognized worldwide"Not to mention the contribution to the economy of our country, its business environment can be described as sinister, it is even likened to"A cemetery for foreign investors"。However, any foreign brand entering the Indian mainland will inevitably be affected by the local Indian brand"Special treatment", which will inevitably cause the loss of tens of millions of yuan worth of assets.
Most popular"Attention"is a Chinese company: first of all, Xiaomi because of"Fabrication of false accounts"And obtained 5$5.8 billion in fines and $4.8 billion in assets seized; After vivo because"**"The Indian side not only froze 119 bank accounts and demanded bail of 89.9 billion, but also directly arrested two executives of the Indian subsidiary vivo.
A single word from India threatens giants in all walks of life: Amazon was fined 2 billion rupees for "lack of directness", Walmart was fined 1.3 billion yuan for no reason, and Google was fined 2,095 yuan. India's economy and demographic dividend, built with blood and tears, are no longer an advantage, but its difficult and complex business environment has earned it a reputation overseas.
In addition, the local manufacturing industry in India's low- and middle-end economy is still mainly labor-intensive. The manufacturing of mobile ** still relies mainly on assembly, and most of the components are imported from China. It is widely believed that if this situation continues, India will not be able to become a true high-end manufacturing hub, but will become a low-value-added processing plant for OEMs in other countries.
In November last year, China's permanent representative to the United Nations made an official response, saying that any reform of the United Nations must follow the fairness and justice of the international community, otherwise it will cause a chain reaction if it is not careful. However, our position is clear, and it is still uncertain whether India will be able to attain a seventh membership in the United Nations.
If India only cares about its own selfish interests and vainly tries to use the functions and powers of the Security Council to seek its own interests, and if it fails to adjust its reasonable stance in a timely manner, it will be difficult to win the unanimous approval of the five permanent members, and its road to permanent membership will also be difficult.