After the election campaign on Taiwan Island, there are obvious differences in the statements of var

Mondo International Updated on 2024-02-01

After the election campaign for the person in charge of local provincial affairs in Taiwan, the election of Lai Qingde caused a reaction from some Western forces and their "little partners." In addition to the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Japan, South Korea and the Philippines have congratulated Lai on his election. These countries are basically loyal supporters of the United States, and their statements are mainly aimed at pandering to the United States and giving the United States some face. However, China has expressed strong opposition and solemnity to this, believing that such a statement will only further provoke confrontation and embarrassment.

In these countries, the hegemonic behavior of the United States has caused discontent on a global scale. Many countries do not support the perverse actions of the United States, believing that such practices are contrary to themInternationalLaw andInternationalJustice. Especially in the current periodChina and the United StatesAgainst the backdrop of tense relations, the behavior of the United States and its small partners has aroused the vigilance and concern of other countries.

In contrast to the United States and its small partners, most countries andInternationalThe organizations are all on the side of justice, adhere to the "one-China principle", and show their support for China. Russia, Indonesia, Hungary and the League of Arab States have all publicly expressed support for China's position.

Among these countries, India's position is particularly highClever enough。Unlike other countries, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India** have remained almost silent on the matter. India treats the incident as if it had happened and does not officially report and state it like other countries. This raises the question of why India is so low-key, or even unconcerned, about Taiwan's local elections.

In fact, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India'sClever enoughThe point is that they realize that the Taiwan issue has becomeChina and the United StatesOne of the focal points of the confrontation. No matter what kind of statement India makes, it will arouse opposition or dissatisfaction from China or the United States. Despite the border dispute between China and India, relations are generally good, so India must be cautious about this issue that concerns China's core interests.

Modi knows that China cannot afford to say anything about the Taiwan issue. At the same time, he did not want to offend the United States, so India chose the "ostrich tactic", pretending to know nothing about the matter, which is one of the wisest approaches. Such an attitude can both demonstrate India's independence and avoid itChina and the United StatesFriction between the two countries over the Taiwan issue.

In addition, India wants to demonstrate its independence from the United States. Although India's relations with Russia have been affected to some extent after the Russia-Ukraine war, India is not willing to rely entirely on the United States. Therefore, India has not spoken out with the United States and other Western countries, which shows that they do not blindly follow the position of the United States.

In contrast, the Philippines' statement was a bit clumsy. The Philippines said that it adheres to the "one-China principle", but Marcos Jr. of the Philippines publicly congratulated Lai on his election, which makes people feel very ridiculous. There are some similarities between the idea of the Philippines and India, hopefullyChina and the United Statesbut the Philippines' move has not achieved the desired effect, which is ironic.

In short, Modi and India's ingenuity lies in their flexibility in dealing with the sensitive issue of Taiwan's elections, demonstrating India's independence and thoughtful diplomatic wisdom.

After the end of the local election campaign in Taiwan,InternationalSocietal attitudes toward Lai's election were divided. The support and statements of the United States and its small partners are nothing more than diplomatic means and political calculations, while most countries andInternationalThe organizations are all on China's side and have expressed their support for China.

India's performance on this issue is admirable. They avoided dealing with it in a low-key wayChina and the United StatesThe conflict between the two countries and showed their independence. In contrast, the Philippines' statement is inappropriate, showing that it adheres to the "one-China principle" and openly congratulating Lai on his election, which is incomprehensible.

This incident made me reflectInternationalRelations are complex and changeable, and each country has its own positions and interests and should be approached with caution. With regard to the results of the local election campaign in Taiwan, we should look at it with a calm mind and not be swayed by the noise of the outside world. After all, China's core interests cannot tolerate interference and interference by others, and we need to firmly safeguard our sovereignty and dignity. At the same time, we should also learn from India's flexibility and independence, and avoid blind obedience and passivity. Only in this way can we be in the complexInternationalMaintain your own development and interests in the relationship.

Related Pages