Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps Air Strikes: Revealing Weak Air Defense Systems and Iran's Resilience Recently, the situation in Iraq and Syria has once again attracted global attention. The U.S. military carried out a series of airstrikes on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and its affiliated militias, and the operation used B-1B Lancer strategic bombers and A-10 attack aircraft. We know from the report that the targets of this air attack involved rocket warehouses, drone warehouses, missile warehouses and command centers.
According to statistics, 10 people have died and 19 have been injured, including 6 Iranian military advisers. In addition, A-10 attack aircraft fired at close range at the camps of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and affiliated militias. Through this battle, we have not only seen the weak side of Iran's air defense system, but also found that Iran, with its dispersed deployment and anti-attack capabilities, is still able to resist the air superiority of Israel and the United States.
However, we need to think deeply about the problems that this incident has exposed. Why is Iran's air defense so vulnerable? Will they be able to cope with future air strikes? In order to answer these questions, let's analyze them together. First of all, the weakness of Iran's air defense system is, on the one hand, due to the backwardness of technology. Compared with the advanced military technology of Israel and the United States, Iran is at a significant disadvantage in terms of air defense systems.
This makes it impossible for them to effectively block and intercept enemy missiles and aircraft in the face of air strikes. On the other hand, Iran also has some problems with the construction of air defense systems. Due to economic sanctions and resource shortages, Iran has not been able to make large-scale investments and improvements, resulting in a relatively lagging replacement of air defense systems. However, Iran is not completely out of the air to counter the air superiority of Israel and the United States.
Relying on dispersed deployment and anti-attack capabilities, they managed to reduce the effectiveness of the enemy's strikes. Iran's military bases and strategic facilities are widely distributed, which means that the enemy needs to devote more resources and time to striking targets. In addition, Iran has adopted a series of defensive measures, such as anti-jamming technology and the construction of underground facilities, to enhance its resistance capabilities. These measures make Israeli and U.S. airstrikes even more challenging.
However, there are some limitations to Iran's ability to resist attack. While they are able to reduce the effectiveness of enemy strikes, they are not fully resistant to air strikes. As we have seen in the report, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and affiliated militias still suffered heavy losses in this air strike. This shows that their resistance to fighting needs to be further improved. In order to strengthen its air defense capability, Iran can consider the following aspects.
First of all, they can improve the overall level by introducing advanced air defense systems and technologies. For example, the Russian S-400 air defense system has a global reputation and can provide Iran with better defense capabilities. Secondly, Iran can also increase investment in its own industry and improve its independent research and development capabilities in order to better meet its needs.
Finally, Iran can cooperate with other countries to jointly carry out research and development and exchange of air defense technology, so as to achieve mutual benefit. To sum up, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps air raid has revealed some problems with the weakness of Iran's air defense system and its ability to resist attacks. While Iran is still able to take some effective countermeasures in the face of Israeli and U.S. air strikes, they still need to strengthen their air defenses to improve their overall resilience.
By introducing advanced air defense systems and technologies, increasing investment in its own industry, and cooperating with other countries, Iran is expected to better protect its homeland and its people in future air strikes. The article argues that the United States, although it has the most advanced and well-trained army in the world, cannot completely defeat Iran.
The article cites the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War, the Iraq War, and the Houthi War in Yemen, pointing out that the US military did not achieve final victory in these wars. The article believes that the US ** team is just an army that makes it impossible for the top decision-making level of the United States to die, and has no other advantages except for high military spending and war expenditures.
The article believes that Iran has the support of Russia behind it, Pakistan with a population of nearly 100 million people in the east, and also has a complete military industry and a large number of armed people. And the US military operation can only cause limited losses, which are acceptable and depleting for Iran. The article also mentions that the Eastern Roman Empire was unable to eliminate the Persian Empire, and now the United States cannot completely defeat Iran.
Finally, the article raises the question of whether the United States will dare to abandon other theaters of operations and concentrate all its military forces on a big war with Iran. The article argues that the United States does not dare to do this because it needs to protect the two island chain theaters of Japan, South Korea, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.