The clothes donated to the disaster area were disposed of by the postal service at will, don't you say it's annoying?
Recently, according to ** report, Ms. Yang, a garment industry practitioner from Guang'an, Sichuan, donated a batch of clothes to a school in Jishishan County, Gansu Province at the end of last year, but a month has passed so far, the school has not confiscated all the donated materials. Ms. Yang later learned that the clothes she donated were donated by the postal service and distributed to other places.
Ms. Yang wondered, "Why should they (China Post) dispose of the clothes I donated at random?" ”
The latest development in this matter is that the staff of the Linxia branch of China Post said that they had reached an agreement with Ms. Yang on a solution, and Ms. Yang also expressed her approval and deleted the relevant **.
As for the solution, is to get back the clothes that have been sent out one by one? Or do you lose money directly by the value of the clothes? As for the issues that the public is most concerned about, the postal side has not disclosed.
Returning to the issue of the postal service's arbitrary disposal of donations, there are too many things that are difficult to understand.
A week after the package was sent, Ms. Yang noticed that the logistics information was abnormally stagnant. She then contacted a teacher at the donated school, who said that she had called the postal customer service ** many times, but she had not received an effective reply. A few days later, the teacher went to the Jishishan Post Office to check and found out that the clothes donated by Ms. Yang had been distributed by the postal service as supplies for other aid projects.
According to ordinary people's understanding, there is an address on the package, and the postal service will deliver the package to the address specified by the customer service to complete the fulfillment. What did the post decide to do and distribute the clothes to others? Is it an act of completely self-determination, or is it a request of the local ** to collect all the donations and then distribute them?
However, since Ms. Yang has made it clear that it is a designated donation, the postal service and the local ** have no right to dispose of this batch of donations on their own for any reason.
The local post office later searched the warehouse and found one of Ms. Yang's 17 packages, and the remaining 16 could not be recovered. If these 16 parcels are considered "lost", they can only be treated according to the maximum compensation of 7 times the postage of uninsured mail, which is a total of 3404$8.
400 pieces of clothes worth more than 100,000 yuan, only pay more than 3,000 yuan for freight, is there such a chill for donors? With such a casual disposal of donations from caring people, will anyone be willing to send donations by post in the future?
Moreover, if it weren't for Ms. Yang's insistence, would the post have helped her find the "missing" donations? If she hadn't posted *** on the Internet, would there have been higher-level outlets in Linxia, Gansu and Guang'an, Sichuan, sending and receiving? And after more than half a month of delay, a solution was suddenly reached?
In any case, the donor's kindness should not be let down. In the month when Ms. Yang and the postal service "pulled to the limit", it was the month when the temperature was the lowest in the Jishi Mountain earthquake area, and the students of the donated schools could have worn the down jackets and sweaters donated by Ms. Yang earlier.
The vague state of the local postal service that the matter has been resolved does not mean that the matter can be completely put aside. In the end, it is necessary to report which link went wrong, whether to criticize and hold accountable the relevant personnel, and how to negotiate and solve it in the end.