Xue Zhiqian responded.
Recently, the well-known singer Xue Zhiqian shared his feelings after watching "Flying Life 2" on Weibo, and the 3 movie pictures shot in the cinema attached to the article caused a "theft" controversy. Some netizens said that the content of Xue Zhiqian's pictures has no ** plot, nor is it used for commercial purposes, and the materials used are all materials used in the official promotion of "Flying Life 2", so there is no need to go online; Another netizen said that refusing to take pictures is a basic requirement for watching movies, and it is indeed inappropriate for public figures to take the lead in stealing pictures.
The word piracy has a very broad meaning nowadays, and many people don't use it very rigorously. It can refer to all the filming behaviors in the cinema for the film, usually when watching movies, many people are used to taking a ** and sending it to Moments, to say that this is also a stealing film, although it sounds a bit on the line, but it is generally good. However, strictly speaking, piracy specifically refers to the illegal act of pirating movies. The law has a strict definition of illegal filming, and when Xue Zhiqian's behavior has received widespread attention, many legal people are reminding that there are two important constituent elements of illegal photography, one is that there is a commercial purpose, that is, the purpose of stealing photography is to pursue profits; The second is that the shooting result is usually **, in other words, the act of taking pictures of private photography in the cinema, taking a static ** with a mobile phone, is not an act of piracy in the legal sense, and the act does not constitute an illegality.
This incident sparked a heated discussion on social networks, in addition to the accusation of stealing photography is very scary, many netizens actually did not criticize Xue Zhiqian's behavior from a legal point of view, his practice obviously does not constitute theft in the legal sense, let alone making profits through theft. An important starting point for many people to criticize him is that they think that this approach could lead to spoilers, which is obviously unfriendly to viewers who have not yet watched the movie. But whether this accusation is established or not obviously depends on the content he filmed, and the ** released by Xue Zhiqian can't see any plot, and it is not worthy of his name to say that he is a spoiler.
It seems that the truth of this matter is very clear, but because of Xue Zhiqian's popularity, many people criticize him based on his celebrity status, thinking that he should take the lead and not do uncivilized things. Also because of his popularity, especially his huge fan base, many people defended him. The two sides go back and forth, making a simple matter very complicated.
Whether an act is illegal or not is obviously directed at the act itself, and the identity of the perpetrator is not primarily considered. Xue Zhiqian, who went to the cinema to watch a movie, is an audience, and ordinary viewers shoot a ** in the cinema and post a circle of friends, this kind of behavior is very normal, and it will never lead to the accusation of so-called theft, but now that this behavior has happened to Xue Zhiqian, many people have lashed out. This contrast is normal, but it is not necessarily reasonable. Sometimes social ** seems to be serious criticism, but it is also in pursuit of traffic. There are many rights and wrongs of celebrities, and they are often responsible for traffic on social **, and many topics around them are easy to be amplified, and when it is their turn to reason, the facts are not the most important. The truth stands, scares people, and the traffic is enough, from this point of view, Xue Zhiqian's current experience is indeed worthy of sympathy, and watching a movie with length and depth has caused such a big ** wave.
If we have to summarize something valuable in this incident, the social copyright awareness reflected by ** is undoubtedly the most worthy of attention. In the past, Chinese films have suffered from a lack of copyright awareness, and before the movie was released, resources were already flooded across the network, and such incidents have happened. Especially before the popularization of the Internet, the commercial value of pirated movies was greater, and the so-called gun version is talking about this type of movie, although the picture quality is not high and the viewing experience is very poor, it is still very attractive in that era of scarce resources. Nowadays, watching movies has also undergone consumption upgrades, and movies with unclear pictures and low quality will not be popular, which is the fundamental reason for the gradual ebb of piracy. In the Internet environment, copyright protection is facing new challenges, and there are many new problems that need to be solved. As for piracy, although the law strictly prohibits this kind of behavior, its social influence and destructive power are much less than before.
Wen l Green Wave.