Loulan clothing originated from Hanbok? Korean historians deny it
This is a cover of a Korean historian that showcases his in-depth research and unique insights into a particular historical period.
Seeing the cover of this **, people have to be amazed: Korean scholars are conducting cultural studies again! And this time, the scope of their research has gone far beyond the Northeast region, and has penetrated into the well-known Loulan culture in our Northwest Region!
2. For the first time, Korean historians have turned their attention to the Loulan culture, which has had a profound impact on East and Central Asia. The scholar's monograph analyzes in detail the interaction between Loulan culture and Korean culture, and points out at the beginning of **, "By comparing ancient books and cultural relics, we can see that the costumes of ancient Loulan and Japan were influenced by the costumes of ancient Korea (Baekje), which is an important contribution of Korean culture to the development of costumes in neighboring countries." ”
Loulan, a legendary name that has been passed down in ancient Chinese history. It was once a northwestern kingdom located in Ruoqiang County, Xinjiang, but now only some historical relics remain.
However, the stories and legends it left behind still make us curious and imaginary about that distant time.
Historical records of the Loulan Kingdom show that it began in 176 BC, experienced a rise and fall in the 4th century, and finally died out completely in 630 AD.
Loulan culture, as a branch of traditional Chinese culture, has long enjoyed a high reputation in China. Surprisingly, however, Korean historians have turned their attention to this culture for the first time in an article.
In this **, historians openly claim that Loulan costumes are highly similar to ancient Korean costumes and are influenced by ancient Korean culture. This discovery has attracted widespread attention, and it has once again triggered people's in-depth understanding of Loulan culture.
According to a Korean historian's research, the characteristics of Loulan clothing are highly similar to the ancient Korean clothing culture. It can be seen from the lines and belts of the costumes that the costumes of the Loulan Kingdom were all developed from ancient Korean costumes.
The cultural exchanges of ancient Korea through the Silk Road had a profound impact on Loulan culture, as evidenced by the comparison of Loulan with ancient Korean cultural relics**.
However, it is a pity that because the historian lacks the necessary historical materials of ancient Korea, he draws heavily on Chinese historical classics, such as the History of Wei, the Book of the Old Tang Dynasty, and the History of the North, to support his view that the Loulan culture originated in ancient Korea and was profoundly influenced by Chinese culture.
The historian made special reference to the historical book "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms".
This ancient Korean history book is not the history of the Three Kingdoms as we know it, but a wild history that contains many myths and stories. Although such a book is not officially a canonical history in the field of historiography, Korean historians regard it as an authoritative reference to support their own views.
Interestingly, the historian even argues that the variety of styles of ancient Korean costumes was due to the fact that the clothing of the time did not leave enough historical materials and artifacts.
In addition, the Korean history** also proposes that ancient Korea was a maritime power in Asia, which influenced the cultures of the East and the West, and even believed that Loulan was influenced by Korean culture because Korea was a powerful maritime power at that time.
During this period, most of ancient Korea was still ruled by the four Han counties, and the southern part of the peninsula was a primitive tribal union. Before the complete decline of the Loulan Kingdom, the situation on the peninsula had been turbulent and divided.
However, the historian's remarks have aroused the attention and questions of many netizens. Many netizens believe that this historian has written academic ** as an overhead **, and it is simply unbelievable to use Chinese historical materials to prove that Loulan culture originated in South Korea.
At the same time, some netizens questioned why Korean historians should also credit them with the Silk Road, and even claim that a maritime power appeared on the peninsula in the 4th century AD, is it a bit far-fetched?
In short, this practice is an insult to Chinese history and culture, and an irresponsible distortion of Chinese history. Therefore, I believe that such statements are unacceptable and should be corrected and criticized.