"State-owned enterprises are second-class dealers who sit on the ground to collect money, and private enterprises are stupid boys who eat leftovers from state-owned enterprises. ”In January, he stepped down as the dean of the National School of Development of Peking University, and in February, Professor Yao Yang pierced a hornet's nest.
In the past two days, in a first-class interview, Yao Yang said that many state-owned enterprises are second-hand dealers, take the project and do not work, subcontract to private enterprises, and charge 7% of the handling fee.
Yang Yang's words immediately resonated with many netizens, and some netizens complained that 7% is very conscientious, and most of the actual situation is 10% 15%, and some have 20%.
It's really an exaggeration, but when a private enterprise gets a second-hand project, will it have a tight budget, will it cut corners, will it default on the wages of the migrant workers, or even just lose money in the end?
If you want to talk about this market economy, one is willing to fight and the other is willing to suffer, why do private enterprises have to take this mouthful?
Yao Yang's explanation is that private enterprises cannot compete directly with state-owned enterprises, because people don't take you to play.
On the one hand, there are many places to avoid liability, or to avoid responsibility, only hand over the project to state-owned enterprises, even if the ** of private enterprises is lower, but people don't need you.
On the other hand, banks are also different from private enterprises, and are more willing to lend to state-owned enterprises than private enterprises。Some netizens also added that there are some small places where private enterprises can't even get qualifications, and if private enterprises want to eat this bowl of rice, they have to hug the big thick legs of state-owned enterprises first.
Some people say that in the past, private enterprises were also involved, but during this period, there were all kinds of corrupt insider trading, so they had to choose the lesser of two evils.
But is the process of subcontracting state-owned enterprises to private enterprises clean?Perhaps the punishment of corruption still requires greater supervision and transparency, rather than a simple and brutal beating to death.
If you think about it carefully, because some places are afraid of taking responsibility, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises have become such a relationship, isn't this a waste of social resources and a destruction of fair competition?
The decision-makers have been constantly emphasizing that we must optimize the development environment of the private economy, solve the development difficulties of enterprises, and boost the development confidence of private enterprises.
I think it is precisely because of this that Professor Yao Yang will bravely speak a conscience for private enterprises.
He said that this is a matter of execution below. It is normal for large enterprises to take over projects and then subcontract them to some small enterprises, but this division of labor should be market-oriented, and it should be based on strength, scale, and profitability, rather than identity.
If it was the identity that decided everything from the beginning, then this scripture would be read crookedly, and tell me your opinion in the comment area.