It may really come, quietly
Two small **
There are two**small**, after reading it, unless there are extreme feelings, no one pays attention to its maker, and it can also be referred to as the author, which also has some hidden meaning and content.
Composition and production of small **
Take these two small ** as an example, and similar things, which are roughly composed of three parts, namely: text, image, and voice. The text part is composed of arguments, deconstruction, interpretation, etc., the image part is the expansion of the text part, which needs to be selected, edited, merged, coordinated, etc., and the voice part is the conversion of the text, involving male and female voices, speech speed, emotion and other matters, and finally these parts are collectively called a ** file, becoming a whole, showing and disseminating.
Regardless of the part, the initial basic understanding of the matter, all the things related to it are done by people, either individually or as a team, with the help of tools. In a nutshell, it is done by people and tools, and people and tools work together to complete the production, and with the help of tools, it is disseminated. Of course, tools were not used in the era of word of mouth, but that era has passed, and now it has reached the ** era, and it is more than that, so there are some changes.
Here, tools are machines, and this machine is constantly upgrading and evolving.
At the beginning, the relationship between man and machine is primary, man is the main, machine is supplemented, man is active, machine is passive, no one only machine is unable to do things, so the attribution of the result is people, this attribution is also a mark, this mark can become a kind of traceability, whether it is good or bad, one of the statements is views and claims, and there is another statement, that is, copyright.
Copyright must belong to the person, an individual or a group, and be protected in some way.
New situation
At this point, in a new era, that may have changed.
also said that there are two small **, whose belongs to it?
Let's start with the actual situation.
The text part of these two small ** paragraphs was conceived and organized by me, and the ancient saying has the saying "the text is responsible for itself", of course, I am responsible for it. These two passages are a kind of reflection under a certain experience, and there are some views and propositions in them, which are my own, and I am responsible for them. But the other parts, such as the audio, the images, and the arrangement and organization of the text and the audio, are not what I did.
Who did the other part, so to speak, it is clear that it was made by the machine. Of course, I don't know exactly how the machine does it, but the general process is based on my text and is done by AI.
So whose are these two little **s, are they still mine?
Be aware
At first, I didn't know it. One day casually wandering around on the phone,I saw one of the small**,I thought I met a friend.,I opened it to see.,I didn't think it was open at first.,The more I listened, the more familiar I became.,I thought it was stolen.,Look at the root again.,Actually, it's in my account.,It's just that I didn't look at it before.,It turned out to be my text to do the "AI to **" processing. It could have been my own initiative, but I didn't know about it, I just thought it was funny, and I knew that there was such a thing.
Later, when I saw other content on the Internet, its structure, especially the sound, was somewhat familiar, and I remembered that "my little **" seemed to be aware, and maybe it was the same. It's interesting. Although my ** is unintentional, and more of someone else's small ** may be intentional, and such a production is indeed beneficial for communication, especially in the current era.
New questions
It was about last year that AI and related things became popular, and its representatives are basically ChatGPT, AI painting and AI intelligence, of course, this is just my understanding, there may be some laymen, but that's what it means. At that time, I thought that these might be a bit high-end, a little far away from me, but in fact, AI has entered my life, but I haven't noticed it yet.
AI can talk, draw, inductively search, program, and there are many things that AI can do. What is the essence of AI, simply put, as far as the current situation is concerned, AI is still a tool, or a kind of machine, but this kind of machine has surpassed the previous definition of machine, and has a certain human characteristic, thought.
In the case of the small **, the AI completes the audio and ** part, as well as the synthesis and editing work, so who should this little ** belong to, will it just belong to me? If it is measured by the standard of "self-responsibility", who should bear the consequences arising from this?
If it is not possible to confirm the ** and ** of the file in the small **, this kind of use involves the issue of copyright, and whether it is compliant is a problem.
In fact, these are only one side of the problem, and the other side of the matter may be even more serious.
AI can not only complete the work of audio and **, but also complete the work of text, and through learning, its ability to use previous knowledge is much greater than that of humans. Due to knowledge, modern people cannot know all the knowledge content, even if there is no time limit, the biggest possibility is that in a narrow field, there is some limited understanding, in fact, it has formed a new "blind man touching the elephant" situation, but the blind man at this time is human beings themselves. Human beings have created an elephant for themselves, and the level of human intelligence has not been able to exceed the scale of this elephant, so it is impossible to look at it as a whole, so it will form a further new type of blind man.
When knowledge is scarce, people suffer from the limitations and deficiencies of cognition, forming a situation of blindness, and when knowledge is the time, people suffer from the limitations and deficiencies of life and ability, and a new situation of the blind is formed, but the situation of these two forms of blind people is essentially different, and its essence is the difference.
In the new situation of blindness, some people will take advantage of this difference and reinforce it, so that others will believe and accept such a distorted fact, creating a misinterpretation and achieving a goal. Because people can't see the whole picture, they can only trust the details, which in turn exacerbates the degree of blindness. Some seem to be taking advantage of this to continue to accelerate such a process and take the situation further to the extreme.
Here it may be inferred that the diversity of information does not make the cognition more comprehensive, more real, and closer to the essence of things, but makes people's cognition more ambiguous, more confused, and even more paranoid, because people's energy and ability cannot fully cope, absorb and master this information, and can only partially absorb and understand, but think that this is all and form a new paranoia. Some are also willing to take advantage of such a situation and make the world obscure.
Be controlled
In some reports on AI, it is only in the initial stage that AI is almost omnipotent. If "pointing at a deer as a horse" and "reversing black and white" were derogatory portrayals of an act in the past, now this behavior has been given a new name and form, called "debate", and people no longer distinguish and distinguish the content, but are more concerned with the form, making the content irrelevant.
In fact, AI is far superior to humans in terms of capabilities and actions. When AI cites scriptures, with its erudition and strong memory, and meticulous logical thinking, it can completely "reverse black and white", then where the world will go, it is inevitable that it will be a little scary.
As far as the current situation is concerned, AI is still under the control of people, and it does things according to people's will, and the so-called people's will is only some people, some small number of people, and it is these people who are influencing other people, and in fact controlling other people. If AI evolves further and can get rid of human control, what kind of situation will it be if it really is like that?
Differentiation
The gap in material possession is one of the topics that people pay attention to, and it is a topic of focus, and there are some indicators, such as the Gini coefficient, but there seems to be no indicators to measure and judge the gap in knowledge possession, or there are and I don't know. In fact, this disparity affects people on a deeper level, and people don't care.
Maybe it can be further expanded, or extended, called the information gap, and so on. These gaps have greatly divided the population, and this differentiation is no less than the gap in the possession of materials, and even the reinforcement and root cause of the gap in the possession of materials, and this gap in possession is also protected.
Some people also use this gap to create a larger gap and form a greater differentiation, and AI is one of them.
On the other hand, people also like, or identify, those who like and identify with themselves, those information and consultations that have been differentiated, and thus also deepened the differentiation, and there is a saying to describe such a phenomenon, which is called the information cocoon.
In fact, the reason for this phenomenon stems from people's preferences on the one hand, and on the other hand, the new information system "does what it likes", which also exacerbates this phenomenon, making people gradually distance themselves from the so-called truth and form further differentiation.
People who are evacuated
Perhaps it is really impossible to grasp the truth and truth of the real world, so people give up the desire and ability to further explore and know, and return to the original form. If the ancestors pinned everything on the gods and ghosts because of ignorance, and today's people entrust everything to ** because they can't know. If the ancestors were beasts, natural beasts, then the current people are not even zombies, they can only be regarded as puppets, and they are dragged by some people.
It's really coming
Of course, no one wants to admit that everyone is self-righteous, in fact, such a fact has come, but people still do not know, a new world of the blind, has come.
Self-righteous
Did I see it, I knew it, of course not, I was just one of many blind people, and I just touched a rope.