After the movie "All or Nothing" was released, the shocking realities in the film made many viewers break out in a cold sweat. Especially at the end of the movie, anti-wire fraud is being promoted on stage, and there are lurking wire fraudsters off the stage, which makes the audience feel even more terrifying.
In "All or Nothing", because it is through the international cooperation of ** to crack down on overseas wire fraud, some netizens remembered "Wolf Warrior" and "Wolf Warrior 2", and asked Wolf Warrior why he didn't rescue his compatriots. As a result, Wu Jing, the star of "Wolf Warrior", was pushed to the forefront by **.
As a result, "All or Nothing" was released on August 8 last year, and on January 30 this year, 10 leaders of the northern Myanmar wire fraud were escorted back to China. What awaits them, needless to say.
After the release of the movie "Article 20" directed by Zhang Yimou and starring Lei Jiayin, Ma Li, Gao Ye, Wang Xiao, Zhao Liying, etc., some netizens said, who is the first to eat crabs to verify whether Article 20 is reliable.
This netizen is very cute and asks profound questions. From his words, it can be seen that he is actually a little disappointed and even a little desperate about the reality in his heart.
The main connotation of Article 20 is that the law must not yield to lawlessness, but must return social fairness and justice, and let the people regain confidence and trust.
Article 20 is three stories, one is the case of Wang Yongqiang, the other is the case of Zhang Guisheng, and the other is the case of Han Yuchen who was bitten back for righteousness.
Behind these three stories, Wang Yongqiang's case involves Kangcun village tyrant Liu Wenjing and Old Man Liu; Han Yuchen was implicated in the school bullying Zhang Ke's father, the director of education; Zhang Guisheng was imprisoned for three years for intentional injury for his courageous efforts to stop the harassers, and it was not clear who was involved behind it.
However, Han Ming, played by Lei Jiayin, discouraged his petitioning behavior again and again, and someone must have put pressure on Han Ming.
In these cases, village bully Liu Wenjing bullied Wang Yongqiang's wife and was stabbed 26 times. For animals like Liu Wenjing, even Ling Chi can't be angry. However, Mr. Liu actually gathered a crowd to put pressure on the procuratorate to prosecute Wang Yongqiang. Doesn't this refer to the deer as the horse, black and white reversed?
In the movie, in order to escape and exonerate himself, Han Ming moved out so many wrongly judged cases to prevaricate Lu Lingling.
The provisions of the law are clear and clear, but why are there so many cases of legitimate defense and righteous courage that have been wrongly convicted?
The issue is not complicated, the letter of the law is interpreted by the law enforcer, and the case is decided by the law enforcer. If the law enforcer takes a crooked position and discards his original intention, he will become the perpetrator. After the bad guys commit violence, they can continue to be domineering, and their arrogance will become more and more arrogant.
Those who defend themselves and act bravely in the face of justice are wrongly convicted and punished. In the long run, how can the common people live, and they will not be able to live.
A person like Wang Yongqiang, if it weren't for his wife being abused by Liu Wenjing**, if he himself hadn't been abused by Liu Wenjing, would he have killed someone? Everything about Wang Yongqiang was forced.
If Wang Yongqiang is prosecuted and sentenced again, is there still heavenly justice? There should be many people who have experienced Wang Yongqiang, Zhang Guisheng, and Han Yuchen in the movie.
According to Han Yuchen's family background in "Article 20", his father is the prosecutor of the Municipal Procuratorate, and his uncle is the deputy captain of the Municipal Criminal Police Brigade.
In the eyes of ordinary people, the director of education Zhang will sell face to them. But why Zhang, the teaching director played by Zhang Yi, is not relenting, it can be seen how much the evil forces have swelled and how arrogant they are.
For people like Mr. Liu and Director Zhang of Kangcun, if they don't clean up, how can the people live and have confidence?
The netizen mentioned above, he may not have a similar experience in the movie, but it can be seen that he is pessimistic in his heart. If Zhang Yimou filmed "Article 20" just to popularize legal knowledge and just draw a pie on the screen, and there was no change in reality, the audience and the people would definitely be more disappointed and pessimistic.
However, if the movie "All or Nothing" can become a reality, who can guarantee that "Article 20" will not become a reality?
What is behind village bullies, school bullies, and street bullies has been made clear in Article 20. As a national teacher-level director, Zhang Yimou, will he shoot "Article 20" casually on a whim? Definitely not.
Zhang Yimou's filming of "Article 20" can be understood as his blowing of the horn. Believe it or not, it is estimated that a group of village bullies, school bullies, street bullies and the umbrellas behind them will soon be dug up.
Longteng New Year film recommendation