A news that shook the financial world has quietly spread recently: Mackenzie Scott, the ex-wife of Amazon founder Bezos, quietly sold tens of billions of dollars worth of Amazon** in her usual low-key way. This action is not only jaw-dropping, but also sets off waves in the contrast between her and the new socialite Sanchez.
It is reported that the 52-year-old Scott has sold nearly 65.3 million shares of Amazon** in the past year, with a total price of $10.4 billion. This number is astronomical for ordinary people, but for a wealthy woman like Scott, it seems to be just an ordinary thing. She is said to have divested half of her Amazon stake in the past five years, but still retains a net worth of $37.6 billion, and her wealth has not been shaken in the slightest.
Scott has always been a low-key woman, who doesn't like to show off or show off. Her style of doing things is in stark contrast to many celebrities who pursue the best rate. Scott's life seems to be a low-key storybook, unobtrusive but full of meaning, unobtrusive but evocative.
As a self-made woman, Scott is a top-notch defender of her privacy, and her style is worth emulating. Those celebrities who keep asking for privacy but frequently ** look a little vulnerable in front of Scott. She doesn't want to be famous, she doesn't seek recognition from the outside world, she just silently does her best, this calmness and calmness are really commendable.
However, in stark contrast to Scott's low-key life, her ex-husband Bezos is high-profile, always under the halo, accompanied by his fiancée Sanchez, showing off his style. The appearance of Sanchez seems to have added a touch of color to Bezos's life, and she has become the booster behind Bezos's career, and joining hands with Bezos to do charity and dedicate love to the society has become a topic of conversation.
The contrast between Sanchez and Scott is not only reflected in the lifestyle, but also in the philanthropy. Scott has been quietly giving, and Bezos and Sanchez's philanthropic efforts have been in the spotlight, donating more than $16.5 billion to more than 1,900 organizations in recent years, including $2 billion alone last year.
Despite a pledge of $100 million for the recovery of Maui, Hawaii, only $15.5 million has been implemented, which has sparked some controversy. Bezos's high-profile is very different from Sanchez's pursuit of fame and fortune, but this may be a true portrayal of the world, where money can buy far more than fame and status.
Not only does Sanchez frequently appear in street photography, but her dress has caused a lot of controversy, and some people have even bluntly said that she lacks elegance. American celebrity Megan Kelly bluntly questioned Sanchez on a podcast, calling on her to be more elegant. This kind of-for-tat rhetoric makes people wonder what is the definition of Vanity Fair, and whether elegance and fashion can coexist?
In this world, everyone has their own way of life and values. Scott opted for a low-key and unhurried approach, while Sanchez sought to show off.
Bezos's world is made more gorgeous by Sanchez's presence, while Scott's life is more tasteful and connotative because of her low profile. Either way, it is an attitude towards life, and it deserves respect and understanding.
In this world of money and glory, Scott and Sanchez interpret the meaning of life in their own way. Perhaps, on the road of chasing fame and fortune, we can all find some inspiration from them, that is, no matter what lifestyle you choose, the most important thing is to be yourself, and the real value may not lie in the external show-off, but in the depths of the heart.