Recently, Biden issued a statement in response to an attack allegedly carried out by Iranian-backed armed groups in Syria and Iraq, saying that the United States would "choose the opportunity to hold the perpetrators accountable in its own way". This statement has aroused widespread concern in the international community, especially in the Middle East, where tensions have re-escalated.
Biden's statement highlights his tough stance on regional security issues. At the same time, however, John Kirby, the coordinator for strategic communications at the White House Committee, sent another signal of relative restraint in an interview, saying that the United States does not seek war with Iran and wants to avoid a larger conflict in the Middle East. This seemingly contradictory statement actually reflects the strategic calculations and trade-offs of interests of the United States in the current complex and volatile Middle East situation.
Iran, for its part, has vehemently denied any allegations related to the attack and blamed the escalation of tensions in the region on Israel's ongoing military campaign and U.S. support for Israel. Iranian spokesman Kanaani said at a press conference that the United States has repeatedly violated the sovereignty of Syria, Iraq, Yemen and other countries, and these actions have exacerbated the instability of the regional situation. In particular, he pointed out that the root cause of the escalation of tension in the Red Sea, Lebanese-Israeli border, and many other places is Israel's military action and the unconstructive stance of the United States and other Western countries in the United Nations.
In this seemingly confrontation between the United States and Iran, the interests of many countries and regions are actually entangled. The stability of Syria and Iraq, as important countries in the region, has a direct bearing on the peace and tranquility of the entire Middle East region. As a regional power, Iran's influence in the Middle East cannot be ignored. The involvement and intervention of the United States has undoubtedly made the situation in the region more complex and volatile.
It is worth noting that US policy in the Middle East has been controversial. On the one hand, the United States asserts its interests in the region through military intervention and diplomacy; On the other hand, the actions of the United States have often also aroused the resentment and resistance of regional countries. Under these circumstances, the United States needs to be more cautious in its relations with Middle Eastern countries, especially with regional powers such as Iran.
For Iran, its foreign policy is also facing difficulties in the face of US pressure and sanctions. However, resolving differences through dialogue and consultation remains the best option. Iran can seek solutions to its problems through communication and cooperation with the international community, rather than responding to U.S. pressure by supporting armed groups or taking military action.
In addition, the international community should also play an active role in promoting the peace process in the Middle East. As the most representative and authoritative international organization, the United Nations should play a more active role in the Middle East issue. By promoting dialogue and consultation among all parties and seeking consensus and solutions, the United Nations can make an important contribution to peace and stability in the Middle East.
To sum up, behind the tensions between the United States and Iran are complex regional games and conflicting interests. The key to resolving this issue lies in the parties concerned to remain calm and exercise restraint and seek consensus and solutions through dialogue and consultation. At the same time, the international community should also play an active role in promoting the peace process in the Middle East. Only in this way can long-term peace and stability in the Middle East be achieved.
Hotspot Engine Program