Shanghai's ** began to bombard the Shanghai Municipal Transportation Commission's miraculous decision today to ban online car-hailing operations at Pudong Airport, citing the need to protect the profits of taxi drivers. "Because they're working hard, they have to wait in line for five or six hours a day. Passengers only need to wait for 5-6 minutes....”
Really, why don't they guarantee the right of the majority of passengers to make their own choices?
How far has the taxi service in Shanghai dropped?
Do you want to force everyone to use higher and worse service vehicles?
The central question for this is, if you're not happy with it, is there a legal remedy to fix it?
In addition to speaking out on the Internet, is there a legal and effective way to put forward some of your own opinions or opinions on such a sudden administrative management document, and to be able to obtain an effective ruling through such a legal channel?
I think legislators can consider how to build and improve such a legal approach, how to let the voice of the people be presented through legal channels, and how to build a credible legal platform, so that such administrative documents can be put on this legal platform for all parties to discuss, and through full communication and discussion, find a balance that can meet the interests of all parties to the greatest extent?
In reality, we have seen many such notices or documents. Sometimes, a small notice or document can make a big difference in the interests of many people in the local area. If we rely on ** to promote change every time, even sometimes** may not be able to promote change, and it may not be of substantial help to the rational and peaceful construction of the whole society.