The flatbread has exceeded 59,500, and many people are already so excited that they can't sleep!
This euphoria has penetrated into the capillaries, and there is an urge to erupt from every hair.
The sentinel of the spirit is completely dormant, forgetting the danger of approaching step by step, and even hallucinating, like a needle of anesthetic, constantly self-a**, happy to self-comfort.
As opportunities and benefits skyrocketed, the risks never took a nap, and on a most unexpected afternoon, they suddenly came, completely confused, like a game, a moment ago, still enjoying non-stop, and a moment later, a blow to ......the head
In recent years, Mr. Ding has encountered many cases of residential surveillance at a designated location, and if there is any commonality between these cases, then the following two points must not be avoided:
One is that it involves virtual currency, and the other is that the case is not simple.
This "not simple" does not refer to how complex the case is, most of the cases are basically that the transaction involves fraud, illegal operation, opening a casino, pyramid scheme and money laundering, the project party is involved in fraud, non-absorption and pyramid scheme, and the custodian or third party is involved in fraud, money laundering, pyramid scheme and illegal computer intrusion.
The case may be complex, the case may not be complicated, but the interests involved are generally not simple.
To get back to the point, why didn't you send it to the detention center after being arrested?
And to RSDL?
I'm also very curious, and I've asked this question every time I have done such a case.
Some people say that it is the need to handle the case.
But if you have to ask, what exactly is needed?
There is a high probability that the other party will tell you four words - "no comment"!
Some people said that it was to facilitate arraignment, but I said that it was very convenient to send it to the detention center for arraignment.
The other party will most likely tell you that in the hotel, you can serve the people 24 hours a day.
I did not forget to advise me to ensure that my client has rest and food in accordance with the law.
The other party will most likely tell you that the detainee's food is better than our detainee's food, and the hotel's double room is more comfortable than our case-handling officer's sofa.
Some people said, "Why didn't we let the lawyer we hire meet with us while we were living in a designated detention center?"
There is a high probability that the other party will tell you that you can rest assured, you have already reported to a certain group, and the right to meet with lawyers will be protected in accordance with the law.
But if you are still chattering and asking for a lawyer to meet with the client within 48 hours in strict accordance with the law, the other party may say that the equipment for the meeting is not in place, and the other party may say that the equipment is in place but is still being debugged.
Director Ding Feipeng is in Shenzhen.
Some people said that we must let our lawyer meet as soon as possible, and the family members are worried that the people inside have been blinded, and they hope that they can feel at ease when they see the lawyer, and they also hope that the appearance of the lawyer and legal help can make the people inside sober up.
There is a high probability that the other party will tell you, don't worry, it's the 21st century, it's all civilized law enforcement, and there's nothing to worry about.
I also asked the people in it what was on their minds during the designation of residence.
The most common answer I received was that I wanted to see a lawyer that the family had hired on their own as soon as possible.
If you ask them why they want to see a lawyer?
Some people will say that they want to ask their lawyer, is it possible to get out with a refund?
Some people said that they wanted to ask their lawyers, did they sign the paper so that the employees could go out?
Some people will say, are those promises real or false?
If I give up everything, can I really be forgiven?
These soul tortures are really good questions!
But in any case, I advise the person concerned to remain optimistic, whether it is to open his eyes in the morning or during the day, whether he opened his eyes an hour ago or half an hour ago, he should be confident that the future of this world has never belonged to pessimists.
You know? I have seen people who are under residential surveillance at a designated location in a hotel, not to mention the uncle who handled the case, as well as hundreds of seconded police officers and brothers, dozens of criminal suspects' food and accommodation and consumption, various hardware and software equipment, and a day's expenses.
What a war of attrition!
A campaign, if it consumes a lot, then what is the most valuable?
That's right! Time!
What is the meaning of time?
That's right! The asymmetry of information!
Some people say that when it comes to information, his path is wide, and if you don't believe it, you look at the gods of all walks of life on the road to the western heavens.
Journey to the West is really a classic, it's a real cow!
Let me guess first, is this the standard answer?
This case is very big", this case is supervised and handled at a certain level", this case is committed by a gang, and it is still waiting to be determined", this case has a lot of impact, and all sides are staring at it"....
Some people say that there is no truth in this world, but I want to say, no matter what, don't be pessimistic, no one will be bored enough to play with us for free.
Don't get me wrong, it's not a consolation, if you don't believe me, come back to me in a month or two.
I'm sure you won't be sad at that time.
Perhaps, it will not come back, and it has been ...... to go home and be reunited
Director Ding Feipeng is in front of **.
As a criminal lawyer, how can you meet your client as soon as possible?
1. Adhere to the bottom line of the law and defend the dignity of the law
The law provides that defense lawyers have the right to meet and communicate with criminal suspects who are in custody or under residential surveillance, and case-handling units shall lawfully safeguard defense lawyers' right to meet and preserve lawyers' practice rights;
Except in cases of crimes endangering the law, terrorist activities, or especially major bribery crimes, where a defense lawyer meets with a criminal suspect under residential surveillance during the investigation period without the permission of the investigating organ, and the defense lawyer requests a meeting with a lawyer's practice certificate, a law firm certificate, a power of attorney, or an official legal aid letter, the case-handling unit shall promptly arrange the meeting, and must not exceed 48 hours at the latest.
2. Require the criminal enforcement prosecution department of the procuratorate to conduct supervision
Article 2 of the Provisions of the People's Procuratorate on the Supervision of Residential Surveillance in a Designated Location stipulates that where a public security organ, a people's procuratorate, or a people's court applies DLR to a criminal suspect or defendant, the people's procuratorate shall supervise the legality of the decision and implementation of DLRS in accordance with law. Article 7 stipulates that in any of the following circumstances, the people's procuratorate shall initiate supervision over the legality of the decision to place the person under DLRS: (1) The criminal suspect and his legally-designated person, close relatives, or defender believe that the decision to place DLRS is unlawful, and submit an accusation, report, or appeal to the people's procuratorate; (2) The people's procuratorate discovers that the decision made by the investigating organ (department) to place DLRS in a designated location might be illegal through efforts such as intervening in the investigation, reviewing for arrest, reviewing for prosecution, prosecuting for criminal enforcement, and filing and review; (3) Where the people's supervisors find that the decision to place them under DLRS is unlawful, and submit an oversight opinion to the people's procuratorate; (4) Other situations where oversight shall be initiated. Article 20 stipulates that if the people's procuratorate discovers any of the following circumstances during the supervision of the enforcement of residential surveillance in a designated location, it shall submit a corrective opinion to the enforcement organ or case-handling organ in accordance with law: ......2) Failure to notify the family of the person under residential surveillance within 24 hours of carrying out residential surveillance in a designated location, except where there is no way to do so; ......4) Unlawfully restricting a person under residential surveillance from meeting or communicating with a defense lawyer; ......7) Requiring the person under residential surveillance or their family to pay expenses; (8) Other illegal circumstances. At the same time, according to Article 567 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure of the People's Procuratorate, "the People's Procuratorate shall supervise whether there are any of the following illegal acts in the investigation activities: (14) obstructing the parties, defenders, litigants, and duty lawyers from exercising their procedural rights in accordance with the law."
3. Seek assistance from the police supervision department of the public security organ to which the investigating organ belongs
IV. Seek assistance from the local judicial bureau or lawyers association's rights protection center to protect lawyers' basic practice rights
5. Seek assistance from people's supervisors, and the people's supervisors are to submit oversight opinions to the people's procuratorate
I wrote here and took a look at the flatbread, it's almost 60,000!
It's scary! To be continued, and listen to the next breakdown).