Since the United States announced the formation of the Red Sea escort alliance, this alliance has attracted much attention. HouthisArmedRepeated attacks on merchant ships in the Red Sea have brought the United States face to shame. In order to safeguard its own interests and image, the United States quickly announced the formation of an escort alliance. At first, the United States claimed that the alliance had ten member states, which later increased to more than two dozen members. But inexplicably, Spain, a US NATO ally, immediately jumped out and said that it would not participate in the alliance. This uncooperative attitude is very annoying to the United States.
In 2024, the United States and the United Kingdom threatened the Houthis with forceArmedThe only response expected was drones and missiles. This further angered the United States, especially those countries that were the first to express their reluctance to participate in the Red Sea escort alliance, such as Spain. American PremiumMilitaryIn order to exert pressure, the personnel demanded that Spain reconsider whether to participate in the convoy alliance. However, this heavy-handed approach has not worked, but has deepened disunity within NATO. Biden also faces many internal problems, and the Secretary of Defense does not take ** seriously, and it will only backfire if the United States presses again with a tough attitude. If it continues, NATO may be dissolved. At this time, the whole world is laughing at the United States, which reminds me of Italy's announcement of its withdrawal from China last year".The Belt and Road Initiative"Scenario of the initiative. China *** responded, there is no problem,".The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative is open and collaborative, and comes and goes freely. Even if we quit in the end, we won't keep it, and we don't need to stop it. This answer gives a glimpse of who is the defender of freedom. Of course, I am well aware that these two situations cannot be directly compared. After all, NATO isMilitaryThe Union, most of whose members were once colonial countries, can be said to be a gang of bandits, practiced in the worldHegemonism。According to their logic, there is a reason for a big fist. According to this logic, there is nothing wrong with the United States pressuring Spain. And".The Belt and Road Initiative"The Initiative is a platform for regional cooperation, so to speak, a group of countries doing business together. In the process of doing business, it is no problem to make money by being kind, and it is no problem to leave if you want to make money. Italy withdraws".The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative does not mean that there is a problem with the initiative, but that Italy itself is not strong enough, its industry is backward, its products are not competitive, and it cannot be compared with other developing countries. Now everyone is wondering why NATO's unity is so fragile, and "The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative is thriving? If the world needed to choose a new leader, who would it choose? I believe that the performance of the United States has already given the answer.
The fundamental reason for the United States' demand that Spain reconsider its participation in the Red Sea escort alliance is the dissatisfaction of the United States with its NATO ally. In the face of the HouthisArmedThe United States expects the support and cooperation of NATO member states. However, in the face of this problem that plagued the security of the Red Sea, Spain did not respond positively to the call of the United States, which made the United States disappointed and angry. From this situation, it can be seen that the unity within NATO has been challenged, the autonomy of each country has become prominent, and the pursuit of national interests has become the primary goal of each member state.
In addition,United States**There are many problems at home. The Minister of Defense does not attach importance to the opinion of **, which gives something elseNATO membershipAt this opportunity, they questioned the leadership of the United States. The U.S. hardline approach will only further weaken NATO's cohesion and partnership. The ** and non-cooperation of important NATO members has given other countries the opportunity to challenge US hegemony, which has intensifiedInternationalRelationship instability.
NATO is oneMilitaryAlliance, with a strong hegemonic overtone. It consisted of a number of bandit chieftains who were once colonial countries, which passed the practiceHegemonismto defend their own interests. Under this logic, the rule of power, the strong have the final say. Therefore, it can be said that it is reasonable for the United States to pressure Spain to reconsider its participation in the Red Sea escort alliance.
In contrast, China's "The Belt and Road Initiative"The Initiative is a platform for promoting regional cooperation. China hopes to achieve common development and prosperity through cooperation with many countries. On this platform, countries can cooperate on an equal footing and jointly promote mutually beneficial and win-win development. This way of cooperation is more flexible and open, and is full of the spirit of win-win cooperation.
Comparing these two cases, we can see the different attitudes of Spain and Italy. Spain received the USS Victoria missile frigate as a gift from the United States, but was unwilling to act in the interests of the United States. This act of putting interests first has caused displeasure in the United States. And Italy withdraws".The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative is because of its own economic strength and its failure to compete with other developing countries. Thus, we can see that the rupture of unity within NATO is based on the trade-off of the interests of the countries themselves, and "The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative places greater emphasis on equal cooperation and common development.
In the face of pressure from the United States, Spain and Italy have chosen different paths. Spain was unwilling to act in the interests of the United States, showing a spirit of autonomy, while Italy withdrew because of its own problems".The Belt and Road Initiative"Initiative. Both of these situations highlight the autonomy of the State and the pursuit of its own interests.
It is worth pondering why unity within NATO is so fragile, and "The Belt and Road Initiative"Can the initiative thrive? This is because NATO is a group of powerful countriesMilitaryAlliance, while ".The Belt and Road Initiative"The Initiative is a regional cooperation platform for equal cooperation. The world is reassessing the leadership of countries, and if one had to choose, one might be more inclined to choose one that focuses on equal cooperation and shared development. The current performance of the United States has given the answer, and its assertiveness and unilateralism are no longer in line with the presentInternationalThe needs of society.
According to the Spanish **, the US chief of staffJoint MeetingChairman Brown recently asked Spain to reconsider joining the Red Sea escort alliance, claiming that Spain has no reason to refuse. As the chief of the United States ** and Secretary of DefenseMilitaryAdvisor, this request of the United States raises questions. To understand this, we need to start with the announcement by the United States last year of the formation of the Red Sea escort alliance. At that time, the HouthisArmedRepeated attacks on merchant ships on the Red Sea have caused the United States to face a situation of losing face. In order to protect its own interests and image, the United States quickly announced the formation of the Red Sea Escort Alliance, which at first claimed to have 10 member states, and later said that it had more than 20. However, Spain, as a NATO ally of the United States, immediately publicly stated that it would not join the alliance, much to the outrage of the United States.
By 2024, the United States and Britain will face the HouthisArmedThe threat of force was used, but the response was drones and missiles. This once again infuriated the United States, especially for the first countries that were reluctant to join the Red Sea escort alliance, such as Spain. As a result, high-ranking American figures began to pressure Spain to reconsider whether to join the escort alliance. However, this pressure will only further weaken NATO's cohesion and make it even more disunited within NATO. Coupled with the fact that there are many problems within the Biden cabinet, the Secretary of Defense does not take ** seriously, and it will only backfire if the United States presses again with a tough attitude. If this continues, there is a possibility that NATO will be dissolved. At the moment, the whole world is laughing at the United States, which reminds me of Italy's announcement of its withdrawal from China last year".The Belt and Road Initiative"Scenario of the initiative. China responded that there is no problem and that we welcome free and open cooperation. Even if we eventually quit, we won't stop it. This answer gives a glimpse of who the defenders of freedom are. Of course, we can't directly compare the two scenarios. NATO is oneMilitaryThe Union, most of the member states of which were former colonial countries, can be said to be a gang of bandits, implementedHegemonism。According to their logic, might is reason. According to this logic, there is nothing wrong with the United States pressuring Spain. And".The Belt and Road Initiative"The Initiative is a platform for regional cooperation, a group of countries doing business together. In this process, it is okay to make money with harmony, and it is no problem to stay and make money, and it is no problem to leave if you don't want to make money. Italy withdraws".The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative does not mean that there is a problem with the initiative itself, but that Italy's own strength is insufficient, the industrial level is backward, and the products are not competitive and cannot be compared with other developing countries. Now everyone is wondering why NATO's cohesion is so fragile, and ".The Belt and Road Initiative"The initiative is thriving? If the world had to choose a new leader, who would it choose? I believe that the performance of the United States has already given the answer.