Zheshu Li (Shanxi University).
Recently, a strange way of dressing called "disgusting dressing" has become popular on the Internet, in fact, to put it bluntly, it is the clothes that you don't wear to work. Young people, as the "main force" of this kind of dressing, jokingly called "people who don't care about the office" and "what is bad and what is left to wear to work".
In the face of the popularity of this kind of dressing, some people say that this is a neglect of workplace etiquette, and some people call for paying attention to the life pressure of young people. I think that this kind of outfit also has its side that can be promoted, that is, "green saving", and changing the label to it may have unexpected effects.
In fact, "disgusting dressing" is not so disgusting that it is impossible to catch the eye, but it is just a rebellion against "exquisite dressing", and it can also be seen as a reuse of old clothes.
In real working life, the pace of work is fast, the workload is large, and the working environment of most companies needs to be improved. Wearing proper workplace clothes is not conducive to the improvement of work efficiency to a certain extent. Most of the default workplace "standard" clothing is not comfortable, and it is basically not worn in ordinary life, which is equivalent to buying it specifically for work. Women's clothing, in particular, has its irrationality. On the other hand, the old cotton clothes in the "disgusting outfit" are comfortable and fit. It is generally accepted that clothes that have been worn for a long time will be more comfortable, can give you a sense of security and familiarity, make it easier for people to calm down and work hard, and can also save young people an "unnecessary" expense, I don't know how many people will snicker.
Wearing coral velvet pajamas to work in "Disgusting Outfits" is indeed excessive and beyond what is acceptable.
Instead of this, it is better to change the label to promote a green and economical dressing concept. Young people are under a lot of pressure at work, and they are under a lot of financial pressure. Who doesn't want to dress up for work? Especially young people who love beauty. But their economic strength and time cost do not allow them to be so refined. Exquisite clothes are kept for leisure and entertainment, and clothes worn for a long time are kept for work, which is not a kind of reuse of old clothes? Isn't it an avoidance of buying new clothes with low utilization? Instead of having a new piece of clothing sit in the closet, you might as well save on that expense. Instead of piling up old clothes at the ** station, it is better to let it exert its residual heat and accompany the hard and busy day of the workers.
The concept of "urban beauty" in the workplace has its reason; But "disgusting outfits" shouldn't be vetoed by stereotypes either.
Swap out the label "disgusting" for "green."It can be given a bottom line, so that there will be no "sloppy" and "dirty bags" in the workplace; It can also solve the problem of clothing controversy and young people's pressure and lack of time. Why not?