MyanmarRefugeesThe flock to India has been unexpected, yet they are confronted with the reality that India is "not friendly enough". India** plans to build a fence in the border area of Myanmar-India to stop the influx of people from Myanmar. The decision raises questions about the friendly image of India, which was once a colonizer of Myanmar and now chooses to ignore its neighbors when they are in trouble. However, there are a variety of practical considerations and challenges behind this move by India**.
First of all, from MyanmarRefugeesIt has put tremendous pressure on social governance in India in terms of numbers. Since February 2021, the Indian state of Mizoram alone has reportedly received about 30,000 MyanmarRefugees。This is just an official figure, in fact, as the situation in Myanmar continues to escalate," 1027" incident and other conflict eventsRefugeesThe influx is far beyond India's capacity. theseRefugeesMost do not have access to skills training, and they live in conditions of extreme poverty and lack adequate food, drinking water and shelter, forcing them to find a way out, which can lead to security problems. In order to maintain the security of the border, India has had to invest a lot of police force. Therefore, India** has chosen to build a wall on the border to contain itRefugeesThe influx is also aimed at maintaining law and order and stability in the country.
Secondly, Indian'sEconomyThe situation is not optimistic, and it is difficult to bear the causeRefugeesHuge expenses incurred due to the influx. It is understood that India has a population of about 1 billion people per capitaConsumption levelLess than $2. Under such circumstances, it is difficult for India to afford to take over MyanmarRefugeesbroughtEconomyBurden. If a nationwide rescue action is taken, it will undoubtedly cause the ** of the bottom society. As a result, India has had to shift the blame to residents close to the border with Myanmar. Although this does not fitThe international communityof the convention, but if BurmaRefugeesProlonged stay in India will place a heavy financial and psychological burden on the receiving country. As a result, India had to draw a clear line with Myanmar and had to limit the right in order to protect its interestsRefugeesof assistance.
Third, India's intervention in the situation in Myanmar has not been as expected. Myanmar has been the main battleground in the competition between China and India, and China hopes to realize its plan to ship Middle Eastern oil directly from Myanmar's ports by strengthening cooperation with Myanmar. India, on the other hand, hopes to limit China's influence in the Indochina Peninsula through friendly cooperation with Myanmar. Due to the differences in the political positions of these two countries, they are inBurmese Civil WarA different approach was taken on the issue. China advocated neutrality, while India provided all possible support to Myanmar, and even India's ally, Russia, intervened in the war. However, despite the help of the two great powers, Russia and India, the Myanmar army** is still unable to control the situation. Many parts of Myanmar are in dire straits, and people are struggling to make ends meet. Min Aung Hlaing's inability and the Myanmar Army's disregard for people's livelihoods have made the situation chaotic. In this case, India** may use this opportunity to try to exert more influence on Myanmar in order to achieve its own political goals.
In general, MyanmarRefugeesThe influx to India presents India** with many challenges. However, India** decided to build a wall on the border and restrict pairsRefugeesassistance, mainly for internal security andEconomyConsiderations of the situation, as well as intervention in the situation in Myanmar, led to the disappointment of expectations. Despite this for MyanmarRefugeesIt's a harsh reality, but they should probably return to their hometowns and face the challenge of the military. After all, only home can give people a sense of security, and everything else is just fantasy.