Recently, a "million reward" announcement on Weibo sparked heated discussions among netizens, the announcement was released by a company in Jiangsu, and the content of the reward said that it was open to the public to collect clues about Chen's abuse of power, favoritism, ** and other illegal crimes during his promotion to public office, if the clues provided by the informant were transferred to the authoritative department by the company to verify the truth, and led to Chen being investigated for criminal responsibility by the judicial authorities, the company will give the informant 1 million yuan of economic assistance. On the morning of January 29, the reporter learned from the company involved that the "million reward" was indeed released by the company, and the content of the reward was true and effective. (People's Daily Online, January 29).
The company offered a reward of 1 million to collect clues about the illegal and criminal activities of the head of the law enforcement brigade of the Municipal Supervision Bureau, this is actually a real thing, do you dare to believe it? The incident aroused widespread concern because it was so grotesque.
The company took out 1 million to offer a reward, which is a bit surprising. Regardless of whether the company has so much money or not, it is finally reluctant to come up with so much money to fulfill its promises, but the practice of openly soliciting clues on the violations and crimes of public officials is indeed unprecedented, and it can be said to be unprecedented.
What is even more shocking is that the object of the company's report is actually the captain of the law enforcement brigade of the Municipal Supervision Bureau. As the head of the law enforcement team of the Municipal Supervision Bureau, he should be a model of abiding by the law, otherwise how to enforce the law and how to maintain a fair business environment? However, there is actually a company offering a reward of one million to collect clues about his illegal crimes, is it a rumor or something else?
The reporter learned from the company involved that the "million reward" was indeed released by the company, and the content of the reward was true and effective. In fact, as early as January 15, the company has successively released real-name reporting materials to Chen, the head of the law enforcement brigade of the Municipal Supervision Bureau, reporting that he has problems such as administrative inaction, disorderly acts, favoritism, and abuse of power.
The staff of the department involved responded that the matter has been fermenting for a long time, and the territorial department has been intervening in the investigation, but has not introduced the results of the investigation. If the reported public official is really wronged, why can't he refute the rumors and protect his reputation? Didn't he care at all? Including the unit, the local ** also doesn't care about their own image? Public opinion has been fermenting for half a month, but there are no investigation results and no public response, is it acquiescence or letting the truth "rot" over time?
The announcement said that Chen, the captain of the Comprehensive Law Enforcement Brigade of the Market Supervision and Administration Bureau of Changle District, Fuzhou, "In the case of a patent infringement dispute between a company in Jiangsu and our company, as well as the company's complaint that the quality of our products is unqualified, knowing that our products do not have quality problems, and at the same time fully comply with the contract of the purchaser, they still toss endlessly and without a bottom line. Abuse of power to send more than 20 letters to harass units related to our products, and more than 50 investigations were carried out against the owner, construction party, supervision party and other units, and leaked our company's trade secrets to competitors for personal gain. ”
Did Chen abuse his power to send more than 20 letters to harass units related to the company involved, and did he conduct more than 50 investigations against the owner, the construction party, the supervision party and other units? Wouldn't it be easy to verify whether this information is true or fabricated? Why did the local intervention investigation not follow up for half a month? With such an "ostrich" posture, how can people believe that the reported person is innocent? Is the so-called "intervention investigation" an investigation or a tai chi?
Everyone is equal before the law, and no one should try to "cover the cover" in front of the truth, I hope that this incident will not become unfinished news again. (Written by Li Pengguo).