Uncle Wang in Shunyi District, Beijing, has a son and a daughter, and the son has lived with his grandmother since he was a child, and has a poor relationship with his father. The daughter lives with her parents, and although she is married, she has been taking care of and supporting her parents. After Uncle Wang's wife died, his daughter proposed to move her household registration back home, but her son refused. In this demolition, Uncle Wang's family received a total of 1.73 million yuan in demolition money. Uncle Wang wanted to give his daughter 1 million yuan for the demolition, but was sued by his son, and in the end, the court ruled that his son should get more than 590,000 yuan, his daughter should get more than 70,000 yuan, and the rest of the demolition money belonged to Uncle Wang.
Seeing such a verdict, everyone is very puzzled, why did the son get so much, but the daughter only got 70,000 yuan for taking care of the elderly?
This case mainly focuses on demolition disputes, and the judge may take into account the support of children for the elderly when deciding, but it is not the main reference standard. In this case, Uncle Wang's family is an agricultural family, and his son's household registration has been on the demolished house, and he is a member of the village's collective economic organization, so the son is entitled to a share of the demolition money for the corresponding area. On the other hand, my sister's hukou had already moved out at the time of marriage and had not moved back, so she was not considered a member of the village's collective economic organization, so she was not entitled to a share of the relevant demolition money. As for the 70,000 yuan given to the younger sister, it is because the younger sister supports her parents, so that the younger sister can share more of her mother's inheritance.
In short, the demolition money included the son's share, and the son was entitled to claim his own share. The rest belongs to the old man's share, and the old man can freely dispose of it according to his own wishes, whether he saves it himself or gives it to his daughter, and no one else has the right to interfere.
In many demolition disputes, many people are asking the question of whether the married woman can get a share of the relevant demolition money and resettlement housing. Under normal circumstances, as long as the hukou has not moved out, the married woman can also share the relevant demolition money and enjoy the relevant rights and interests, but if the hukou has been moved, then whether she can enjoy the relevant rights and interests depends on the relevant local regulations.
In the process of demolition and relocation, it is very likely that disputes will arise due to the uneven distribution of benefits, and these disputes are often a dilemma under the wrapping of family affection. Therefore, when encountering such disputes, we can first resolve them through negotiation, and if we cannot reach a consensus, we can not drag our feet and protect our legitimate rights and interests through litigation.