Which fund company has the most uncle type fund managers? Not E Fund

Mondo Finance Updated on 2024-02-01

The recently released TV series "Flowers" has come to an end, and the discussion is still hot, for most people, what impresses me is the role of "uncle", and some people even say: "If I have a noble person like my uncle, I will definitely become Mr. Bao." "It can be seen how fortunate it is to have such a veteran who has gone through vicissitudes and has rich experience.

As the saying goes, "there is an old man in the family, if there is a treasure", let's first define the public offering **"uncle" type **manager:More than 16 years of experience as a manager; Annualized rate of return of more than 10%.

Specifically, it is considered as follows: ** The manager should cover at least one round of bulls and bears in terms of tenure, and the most famous ones in history are the bulls and bears around 2008 and 2015. To experience the 2008 bear market of the first manager, such a manager needs to have more than 16 years of investment years, plus the annualized return of more than 10%, this qualification and performance, absolutely worthy of the company's first managerUncle

Conclusion 1:Phu Quoc**It is the company with the most uncle-type managers

As of January 9, 2024, a total of 14 ** managers meet the requirements, namely: Yang Jianhua, Wei Dong, Mao Congrong, Zhu Shaoxing, Bi Tianyu, Yang Gu, Zheng Yu, Xu Lirong, Cao Mingchang, Wang Ning, Zhou Weiwen, Ying Shuai, Chen Shaoping, Yan Fei, as shown below:

Figure 1: Fourteen uncle-type managers.

From the company's point of view,There are the most uncle-type managers under Fuguo** and CEIBS**, both of which are 2, and Zhu Shaoxing and Bi Tianyu are under Fuguo**; In fact, Zhou Weiwen, a subsidiary of CEIBS, was also the manager of Fuguo** before, so he really contributed to the industry in this way.

Then there is the ** company with 1 **manager, namely: GF, Guohai Franklin, Guolianan, Huaxia, Invesco Great Wall, Nanfang, Nuoan, Great Wall, Great Wall, Changsheng, Bank of China.

Figure 2: The company where the 14 uncle-type managers work.

Since the ** manager can be mobile, the number of "uncle-type" ** managers is not limited by the early or late establishment of the **company, and the ** company that is established late can also recruit a veteran, which is also considered the company's.

It can be seen that, to a certain extent, there are the most "uncle-type" managers in Rich Countries.

Conclusion 2:HuaxiaIt is the company with the most novice managers

It can also be seen from the above figure that the public offering has been in the public offering for 25 years, and there are only 14 managers with an annualized return of more than 10% for more than 16 years, accounting for only 038%, it can be seen that there are very few veterans, and in turn, it also shows that there are not a few young ** managers.

If divided according to the investment period: 0-5 years for the new generation; 5 (inclusive) - 10 years for the Mesozoic; 10 years and above is a veteran, and the current situation of the public offering manager is as follows:

Figure 3: Number of managers by investment period.

It can be seen that the new generation has an absolute advantage, not to mention that the uncle type accounts for less than 1%, and the proportion of veterans is not less than 10%, most of them are the new generation.

From the number of new generation managers of each company, it can be seen that Huaxia is currently the company with the most new generation managers, in short, Huaxia has the most novice managers.

Figure 4: The number of managers in the new generation.

In addition, from a practical point of view, there are 1,058 managers who have experienced the 2018 bear market, accounting for 2883%;There are 381 managers who have experienced the 2015 bear market, accounting for 1038%;There are 24 managers who have experienced the 2008 bear market, accounting for 065%, which shows that most of the ** managers are relatively young, and those veterans who have brushed up their experience points in the public offering are not many left.

Based on the above data, it can be seen that the high-quality development of public offering has a long way to go.

This article is a personal opinion, the views are time-sensitive, not as investment advice, past performance does not represent future performance, the market is risky, investment needs to be cautious. List of high-quality authors

Related Pages