Article 20 is really a rare good movie. It is comparable to "I Am Not the God of Medicine" back then.
The difference is that "I Am Not the God of Medicine" is full of compassion for the public, while "Article 20" is more critical. There is a critique of underworld forces, a critique of the judicial cognition that has always been there, and a critique of education.
These criticisms are very timely and powerful, but in the process of criticism, they think too highly of some people. This is mainly reflected in the criticism of education, and there are some suspicions of blackening teachers.
Director Zhang in the film review is a typical villain, but he is given the identity of a teacher. Is it really that bad to be a teacher in the director's mind?
Teachers are a vulnerable group in this society, and there has never been a teacher who can be as tough as Director Zhang, so black and white, and so dare to fight against prosecutors.
Even if Director Zhang is the director of a high school, he is only an 18-grade sesame petty official. Such a petty official, the waist has never dared to stand so straight, and most of them bow down in front of the public procuratorate and law.
The funniest thing is that Director Zhang's son stood up in the face of others, but he asked the other party if he knew who his father was? It's as if his father is a little director, and he can cover the sky with one hand.
There is really no one like Director Zhang's son. Most of them are academic bullies, motivated, always on the road of education involution, and will never engage in any campus bullying.
Director Zhang may look down on teachers, or have a grudge against teachers. Director Zhang is such a ruthless character, his identity should not be a teacher.
He was one of the dark ones, or a wealthy businessman. Or the director of a real administrative department with real power will be more realistic and critical.
There is traffic on the Internet to scold teachers, as a Spring Festival movie, it really shouldn't be such a black teacher, and you can't follow the crowd.
This is my personal opinion, a little suggestion, and it does not mean that I reject this movie.
It is a rare realistic film that can bring laughter to the audience and can move people.
It echoes the demands of the Internet, praises the main theme of punishing evil and promoting good, speaks for justice, and lets the public know that the law is ruthless, but it contains the most simple emotions in the public's emotions.
The most touching sentence in the movie is: "We are not handling cases, but other people's lives." "It gave a lot of psychological comfort to the general public.
At the end of the movie, Lei Jiayin's speech was loud and infectious, and the simplicity was full of passion like fire. Those words have penetrated beyond the storyline. He is not reciting lines, but the most shocking cry to this society.