Sensational social circles! When it comes to the hot topic of female teachers cheating in the United States, I dug deep and found that there is a "double standard" contest at the legal level whether female teachers constitute a crime, which is a legal "feast".
First of all, we focus on the big stage of our country's law. In the field of sexuality, there is obviously a rather unique set of "special provisions" in our law, and in principle, certain acts committed by female teachers and students are not punished by law. This is the so-called "double standard", and let's reveal the mystery behind this legal game.
Let's take a look at the provisions on "** child crimes" and "** crimes". Sexual intercourse between a woman and a boy under the age of 14 is considered a child, but it is considered a crime for a man to have sex with a girl under the age of 14. This obvious legal "double standard" played a role in this incident, when the male student reached the age of 16 and the female teacher was perfectly exonerated!
Let's look at the age requirement of the victim. Regardless of whether a man or a woman has sexual relations with a person of the opposite sex over the age of 14, as long as the other party consents, it does not constitute a criminal offense. In this case, the student was over 14 years old and had a consensual relationship with the teacher, and the teacher was exonerated as such. This provision seems to have an extra "favor" for female teachers in front of the law.
Don't rejoice too soon, the "double standards" of the law are far from over. The Penal Code stipulates that it is not illegal for a woman to have sexual relations with a boy who has reached the age of 14 as long as the boy consents. But if the lady uses coercive means, it becomes coercive**. However, in this case, the female teacher was exempted from the accusation of coercive ** crime, and the "double standard" of the law was once again revealed.
Let's look at the crime of the teacher's ** girl. The law stipulates that a teacher having sexual relations with a girl between the ages of 14 and 16 constitutes the crime of a person with a duty of care. However, in this case, "Teacher Zhang" was not involved in this crime because she had a relationship with a boy. Here, the law seems to favor female teachers.
Finally, there are regulations of the Ministry of Education, which strictly prohibit teachers and staff from having romantic and sexual relations with students, let alone any ** behavior. However, "Teacher Zhang" was only disciplined, far from touching the bottom line of the law.
Overall, are all people equal before the law? In this legal arena full of "double standards", the behavior of female teachers is almost perfectly exempt. This is the "double game" of the law, and people can't help but be amazed. In this wonderful age of law, let us be in awe of the law at the same time, but also be curious about social news to explore the deep meaning. Legal Games Social News Let's stay alert in this feast of law and uncover the mysteries in social news together!