After the military reform, encouraging long-term cadres has become the mainstream, and for the hardship border and coastal defense forces, we have always used the subsidy mechanism to compensate the soldiers in the hardship areas in terms of daily treatment and retirement standards.
Of course, border guards also deserve this compensation, because it is true that many people can't imagine the conditions in many difficult areas, and the impact on people's bodies is still great, so can we change the way of thinking, that is, at the same time as material subsidies, there is also a tilt in the retirement policy?
For example, the standard for retirement is the same now, and the regulations on the number of years of retirement for serving in snow-capped mountains and islands and serving in big cities are the same standard, and it can be changed in this regard in the future, and appropriate consideration should be given when calculating the retirement standards for serving in various difficult areas. For example, the retirement period for those who have served in difficult areas is reduced by 10 percent or 20 percent compared with the standard, that is, they can retire after 10 years of service at the same rank in the mainland, and they can be retired after 8 or 9 years of service in difficult border and coastal defense areas, and so on for various other retirement methods.
This can reduce the working hours of military personnel in difficult areas and reduce the damage to military personnel in harsh environments, after all, many damages are irreversible. For the sake of the health of the soldiers serving in the vast number of difficult areas, it is also necessary to introduce this kind of policy, after all, no matter how high the retirement pension is, it cannot make up for the physical damage, and it is not what everyone wants to see if the retirement pension is used for medical treatment. Salute to the people of the people, pay tribute to the people's soldiers, and the dynamic incentive plan in February