In recent years, the management system of rural grassroots organizations in China has attracted much attention. On the one hand, village secretaries and village directors, as the core leaders of rural grassroots organizations, have made great contributions to rural development. On the other hand, with the development of society, the management model of rural grassroots organizations is also facing the pressure of reform. Recently, the news that the village secretary and village director may be canceled has attracted widespread attention, so who will manage the countryside in the future? This article will analyze this.
We must make it clear that the abolition of village secretaries and village directors does not mean the dissolution of rural grassroots organizations. On the contrary, this is a major reform of the management system of rural grassroots organizations in our country. The purpose of the reform is to optimize the structure of rural grassroots organizations, improve the efficiency of rural governance, and better promote rural development. So, how will this reform be carried out?
On the one hand, China will explore the implementation of the "one-shoulder-to-shoulder" system for village-level organizations, that is, merging the two positions of village secretary and village director into one post. This can not only avoid the problem of unclear powers and responsibilities caused by the overlap of duties, but also improve the decision-making efficiency of village-level organizations. At the same time, this move will also help reduce the administrative costs of village-level organizations and improve the level of rural public services.
On the other hand, China will also strengthen the system of personnel training and selection and appointment of village-level organizations. In the future, the leaders of village-level organizations will no longer rely solely on the traditional election method to select outstanding talents with a certain degree of political awareness, professional ability, and mass foundation through competitive selection and performance appraisal. This reform will help improve the leadership of village-level organizations and inject new vitality into rural development.
The abolition of village secretaries and village directors does not mean that the management responsibilities of rural grassroots organizations have disappeared. On the contrary, the reformed village-level organizations will take on more management responsibilities. So, who will manage the countryside in the future?
Village-level organizations will further strengthen communication and cooperation with superiors. In terms of policy implementation and project promotion, village-level organizations will become important partners of superiors. In this way, village-level organizations will have more say in policy implementation and resource allocation, which is conducive to better promoting rural development.
Village-level organizations will further play the role of mass autonomy. On the basis of villagers' self-government, village-level organizations will strengthen guidance and coordination of villagers' self-government organizations, so that villagers' self-governance will be more standardized and orderly. In addition, village-level organizations will also actively participate in the construction of rural communities to create a rural governance pattern of co-construction, co-governance and sharing.
Village-level organizations will strengthen the management of rural collective assets. In the context of the reform of the rural collective property rights system, village-level organizations will assume the responsibility for the management and operation of collective assets, ensure the preservation and appreciation of collective assets, and create conditions for farmers to increase their income.
The abolition of village secretaries and village directors does not mean the dissolution of rural grassroots organizations, but is a major reform of the management system of rural grassroots organizations in our country. After the reform, village-level organizations will assume more management responsibilities and inject new vitality into rural development. From this point of view, this reform is a great boost to China's rural development.
Any reform will face challenges. The heavier management responsibilities of village-level organizations have set higher demands on the leaders of village-level organizations. How to select village-level leaders with excellent political awareness, professional ability, and mass foundation has become the key to this reform. In addition, how to ensure the stable operation of rural grassroots organizations in the process of reform and avoid the management vacuum caused by reform is also an issue that needs to be paid attention to in reform.
Tell us what you think. Do you think it will be more efficient to see who will manage the countryside after the village secretary and village director are abolished? What are your suggestions and expectations for village-level organizational reform? Feel free to leave a message in the comment area to share your views! Let's work together to make suggestions for rural development and create a better future together!