To put it bluntly, most college students are relatively ordinary college students, and they will face employment problems after graduation.
Therefore, either go to the private sector or work within the system. Under the influence of the employment situation, many people may be more inclined to work within the system, after all, it is very difficult to have a stable job with a good salary.
However, there are also students who believe that it is easier to make money outside the system, and it is not better to be able to solve economic problems in a shorter time.
At present, there are ordinary college students who want to give up the State Grid and choose to work in large private enterprises, is it cost-effective?
We need to understand which enterprises belong to large private enterprises. Generally, Huawei, Haikang, DJI, Schneider, Siemens, etc. belong to large private enterprises, while state-owned enterprises such as State Grid belong to state-owned enterprises.
Having said that, whether it is cost-effective to abandon a state-owned enterprise and turn into a large private enterprise depends on what the real needs of the individual are, whether they can accept the negative feedback brought by the choice, and have a certain ability to deal with the negative feedback.
In terms of work, the intensity is sometimes not low, and it will gradually decrease a little in the later stage, and if you want to continue to develop in the State Grid, your comprehensive ability is not outstanding, and the opportunity is not very large, and the income level will stay at a certain stage for a certain period of time, and there will be little change.
On the other hand, the wages of large private enterprises are very high, but the work intensity is very high, and many people can't stand the work intensity of large private enterprises.
Working in the State Grid should have a lot more personal time.
On the other hand, working in the private sector can greatly suppress personal time, and you will have to give up a lot of personal time to solve problems at work.
For example, at 2 o'clock in the morning, if there is suddenly an urgent matter that needs attention, a large private company may immediately call you, hurry up and solve it, and you can't delay the interests of the company.
If the interests of the company are delayed, in addition to the damage to the interests of the company, their salary may also be reduced, or even to a salary level that is difficult to accept.
If it is not acceptable, then the national grid should be a better choice, and there may be a situation that occupies personal rest time, but the frequency will not be very high, which is basically an acceptable situation.
If you choose a large private company, you may make achievements in a short period of time, so that your economic level can be improved in a short period of time, and some things that an ordinary person pursues, such as buying a car and a house, will be solved in a few years.
In a few years of State Grid to solve the problem of buying a car and buying a house, it is still difficult, after all, if you want to buy a car and a house in full in the system, it is difficult to do it only by salary.
All in all, the choice of State Grid or large private enterprises should depend on what the basic situation of the individual is, and whether the ultimate development needs for the future are clear.
If it's clear, just follow your own path.
No matter which path you choose, there will be obvious shortcomings, choose a large private enterprise, the work intensity is very high, basically there is no private time of your own, and it is easy to face the problem of being laid off, and the choice of State Grid, the salary will not be very prominent, but it is better to be stable, there will be no obvious changes due to changes in the job market, it can develop steadily, and finally the problem of buying a car and buying a house is not a big problem, but it will take a little more time, but it is not so tired. February** Dynamic Incentive Program