In the city, there are often eye-catching activities in a phase, such as the pension of the elderly, whether to choose to go to a nursing home or live at home, the old house is related to the travel of the elderly, whether to install an elevator or change housing, and so on.
Such problems are often a matter of public concern in a city or county. But there are a lot of things that deserve everyone's attention around, do we choose to focus on the things we all see, or are there really more important things?
The problem of home care for the elderly has existed and has always been, but there are many people and few people, and the installation of elevators in housing has been discussed for a long time, and the earliest was spontaneously started by residents. Now there are more topics to discuss, such as the convenience of road commuting, including the problem of sidewalks, slow lanes, motor lanes, width, and number, is it possible for residents to appeal and suggest more? Residents express their demands directly, while public expression should be connected to the direct management department, not by the way of layer by layer of escalation or through the so-called transfer center, conveyed to a department that does not know what location, to assign problems to each management department, and then wait for the reply of these small departments.
These are issues of concern in themselves, and should be directly requested by the residents, and in the shortest possible time, the relevant departments should make a difference, and the good or bad actions should be judged by the residents, judged by the actual work performance, rather than by the departments themselves to decide whether it is an effective or inefficient work process. The discussion of such things is far more meaningful than whether to go to a nursing home or live at home, or whether an old house is equipped with an elevator or maintain the status quo, so such things should be valued by more people, rather than just as if they didn't happen.